With Republicans losing the war on Terror and in Iraq, How long will it take for Democrats to clean house?

Question

Republicans lost the war in Iraq.
Republicans lost the war on Terror

WHY?

Because they are a gang of Hooligans that break every US Law and international treaty.

I know the democrats will fix america but dont you think it will take alot of time to clean house from todays current regime

Answer 1

I didn't think it was possible to use "clean house" and "democrats" in the same sentence.

Answer 2

I don't know that you can actually say that they lost the war. They certainly proved a point. Part of that point, of course, being that using violence against violence only creates, hmmm (tough one here...), MORE VIOLENCE!!! I do not agree with the means that the U.S.'s government has chosen to use, but it's not just the Republicans in office. There are Democrats that support these efforts, as are there Republicans that do NOT. There are also civilians that are totally gung-hoe ready to sling some mud and then there are military members who don't believe in what the government is fighting for. Generalizations are silly. I will be very happy when Bush is out of office, but there are no guarantees that the Democrats will be elected over the Republicans. All we can do is hope that this is the case and that the person elected (either way) can sweep up the pieces that this war has created and glue them back together to form some sort of a normal society for us Americans to live in...where the rest of the world doesn't hate us.

Answer 3

You're making yourself look very foolish. It's ok to disagree with the war, and other policies, but I'd refrain from demoting the hold GOP to simple hooligans. I can name a good number of respectful conservatives that are liked by both "sides".

But to answer your question, party control has had periodical momentum changes since history. Once the public gets tired of one party's inaptitude then other comes in and the circle continues.

Answer 4

they do no longer -- no longer outright, that's. the trendy flesh presser speaks via a variety of 0.5-truths, ambivalences, and fluff by which you will (although that's no longer likely) discover substance ought to one make the attempt to penetrate all of it. lots of the undesirable one hears approximately Iraq is one, the different, or all 3 of those -- although in a contest, 0.5-truths might win palms down for this reason. And in case you extremely pay interest, they do no longer want to lose the conflict -- yet they do no longer extremely want to win, the two. See, to a flesh presser, a conflict is little greater suitable than a reason for political progression; the morals, motives, and outcomes are in user-friendly terms an incredible type of bulky information to artwork via. If President Bush have been to announce an instantaneous withdrawal to be executed with the aid of this time next week, human beings may well be up in palms -- contained on the topic of the liberal politicians, for all the incorrect motives. Bush-bashing has grow to be an magnificent gadget for garnering political help between the louder, greater extreme left-wing; the Iraq conflict is, as verified so aptly with the aid of our national media, their usual source of ammunition. do away with that from the equation, and we unexpectedly discover ourselves coping with such petty squabbles because of the fact the commutation of a sentence or the firing of numerous attorneys -- on none of which you will base a political platform. Assuming a Democrat of the at contemporary-working ilk is elected to the Presidency, you are able to relax certain that the Iraq conflict won't end for a stable long term because of the fact it is going to nevertheless be politically expedient responsible each thing on George Bush for numerous years after he's long previous. no longer in user-friendly terms will this strengthen the recent President's political status (yet in user-friendly terms between the extreme communities to whom she or he's presently pandering), in spite of if it is going to additionally absolve her or him of any duty for any mess ups which ensue in the process the recent Presidential term. that's all in an impressive, quite little field, isn't it?

Answer 5

whatever happened to patriotism. United we stand divided we fall?
I can't say if we are winning or losing, I only know what people tell me in their own biased ways. All I know is that we are getting deeper and deeper into the Middle East and that was the strategy
to begin with, I believe.

Hmmm. do you clean house in the middle of a WAR

When will they start the draft?

Answer 6

Keep dreaming. Not only will democrats not win anything substantial in November, they will lose the presidency again in 08.

The war in Iraq will be won by the West.

Caesar has spoken!

Answer 7

Republicans have NOT lost any war, but the DimocRATS have lost 2 wars, Korean War and the Vietnam War and are in bed with the enemies of the USA!!!!!!!

Answer 8

Democrats are typically against all forms of religious extremism and religious groups trying to impose their beliefs on the rest of us.

Is there really any difference between the Islamic and Christian extremists? Both religious groups want to impose their belief on everyone else, at any cost.

Answer 9

The Republians' only hope is to turn to Colin Powell and John McCain for leadership in warfare. They have ignored their advice to their own (and our own) detriment.

Answer 10

Don't claim victory yet, terrorist boy.
The Terrorists and Democrats haven't won yet--
America is still fighting them.