He seems like he has a pretty weak mind, and very little real will power. How likely is it that he will begin drinking again?
2006-09-17 06:28:01 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Doubtful. Weak willed or not, a UN prosecution probably wouldn't worry him. One hardly ever hears of them accomplishing anything useful.
2006-09-17 06:50:13 · answer #1 · answered by mick69 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Drinking again seems to indicate he was drinking to excess somewhere in the past. This is not true. To quote former first lady Barbara Bush: Former first lady Barbara Bush said Wednesday that her son, President Bush, never really had a drinking problem, though he might have given that impression with some offhanded comments during the 2000 presidential campaign.
I've not heard of any attempts to prosecute for violation of any laws, do you have further on the subject, or did you make that up also?
2006-09-17 13:36:02 · answer #2 · answered by oklatom 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Look... Bush has made some mistakes, but as president he is facing a war on terms that "No Other President" has had to face. What most Americans don't realize is that America was not only sucker punched by Islamic wackos, but that we have been tricked into a war on purpose. China, Russia and the rest of our enemies wanted this response. They want us to wear out our war machines and lose our troop strength and have us fight amongst ourselves and turn other countries against us. Then, when the time is right, they will attack (the real WW3). We need to support Bush, stop fighting among ourselves, get the foreigners out of our country and get ready for some realllllly bad times.
2006-09-17 13:48:52 · answer #3 · answered by White Knight 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm drinking because it's Sunday night. I didn't think a person needed such a grand reason to crack open a cold beer. You're probably drinking because you live in Oregon, right? Bush could be drinking because lots of people hate him. (Not talking about just Americans here. I'm talking about THE WORLD. Just came back from Europe, people hate me for being from the same country as Bush.)
2006-09-18 02:00:19 · answer #4 · answered by Jacqueline 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Didn't vote for him --- but all the W bashers are pathetic. They never say what they would do differently. They just enjoy the current fashion of talking trash. They don't like the war--- they have that luxury as the war has stopped any attacks since 9/11 here. What will these liberals do at the next attack? What they always do: light a candle and have a self indulgent moment of silence for all the dead, and wait for the next attack. We tried it Carter's way-- I prefer W on this.
2006-09-17 13:48:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Every enemy the U.S. has fought has violated this Geneva Convention. You have every right to side with the enemies of your own country. No one is challenging your right to be an Anti-American Liberal. The violations you speak of have been overturned in the Supreme Court every time in the past, I think if I were you, I'd wait for the final verdict, not one given by your local liberal Judges.
2006-09-17 13:37:50 · answer #6 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess not since that won't happen. He won't be prosecuted for war crimes because he hasn't committed any. Hezbollah, on the other hand, has been accused of war crimes by Amnesty International, so maybe THEY will. You see, same old thing from you people, but you are supposed to be the "free thinkers." Yeah, sure.
2006-09-17 13:49:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who is going to arrest him? You? What accord has HE violated? Who will sit the trial? When did you stop thinking and start parroting? He has a weak mind? He is President of the United States, a former Governor. A Yale graduate, and you are???
Blowhard, lighter then popcorn, dropcase.
2006-09-17 13:38:02 · answer #8 · answered by Jimfix 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
About as likely as you becoming president and doing a better job. Can you cite these said war crimes? I would love to know what you're referring to.... or is this another excuse to attempt to crucify GW again? I'm not his biggest supporter, I think that he does an adequate job... keep in mind he can't win for losing.
2006-09-17 13:40:27 · answer #9 · answered by Porterhouse 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Geneva convention only aplys to organized uniformed armys
not guerrilla freedom fighters -no crime here
2006-09-17 13:40:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋