English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-17 06:18:41 · 15 answers · asked by notme 5 in Politics & Government Politics

How about Rush Limpaugh?

2006-09-17 06:30:05 · update #1

15 answers

None of the above. She is an opportunist, who likes money as much as the next person, enjoys notoriety, and has found the recipe to acquire both.

I don't find her credible, and I don't think much of her ethics, but I doubt very much she is stupid. She certainly seems to have any number of admirers, who respond enthusiastically to her blend of sexuality and vitriol.

It's unfortuate she doesn't use her intellect in an honorable way, but I doubt that troubles her.

2006-09-17 06:38:17 · answer #1 · answered by functionary01 4 · 2 0

A hate filled polemicist, but no different from some of the whack jobs on Air America. Although I despise her, I don't for a minute that she's stupid; she's in fact highly intelligent. I'm not sure why you would consider her a gold digger. She's made quite a but of money through her book sales and speaking fees.

2006-09-17 13:25:30 · answer #2 · answered by inpoetry1 3 · 1 0

Ann Coulter is just another religious nut who is probably having a conversation with her imaginary god as I write this.

2006-09-17 13:25:36 · answer #3 · answered by p2prox 4 · 0 1

A strange woman to be in a position of power and influence.


Go big Red Go

2006-09-17 13:22:36 · answer #4 · answered by 43 5 · 1 0

A hate filled person. Coulter has no objectivity. All she is about is hating liberals. No substance or redeeming qualities whatsover.

2006-09-17 14:13:57 · answer #5 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1 1

Dunno - she is kinda attractive (when she does not cut the left side of her hair only). Sometimes she makes a point - other times she is presumptuous, proud, pompous, wrong, biased, fretting, embarrassing, and always believes that : "Right Makes Might" What do you think ?

2006-09-17 13:25:28 · answer #6 · answered by oatie 6 · 1 0

well, she is definitely not objective, she uses what intelligence she has to be vicious in a way no women could be, so that proves the 2nd poster is correct about the sex change gone wrong lol.

2006-09-17 13:31:41 · answer #7 · answered by janie 7 · 2 2

colter is an exploitive waste of oxygen. she is nothing more then a racist, ignorant anti-woman chauvanist. its a sad day for america when people like her get media attention.

2006-09-17 13:25:57 · answer #8 · answered by opticfunktion 1 · 1 1

Smart, funny, edgy, acid tongued and someone the liberals can't win an argument with. Objective:no, Stupid:no, Gold Digger:no.

2006-09-17 13:23:59 · answer #9 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1 5

She's a $500 sex change that gone bad

2006-09-17 13:21:58 · answer #10 · answered by Just another Yahoo answerer 6 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers