Of course. That will always be her child no matter what.
2006-09-17 05:19:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Southern Lady 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
sure-the child will always be in her heart and mind.several of my friends are adopted.altho they have gr8 parents,they feel somehow spiritually connected with their birth families.if ur so concerned,why didnt u help this young mother keep her baby?are u an angry relative-if so y,didnt u help?are u the father-y werent u there?if u werent around when it happened,and dont know fully all the reasons why this happened,who are u to judge?what about women who desperately wanted their babies,but tragically miscarried?do u think they are not worthy to be called "mother",when they did their best?do u think someone who has a stillborn child ever forgots,even tho the child never drew breath?is a mother whose 5 year old dies,not sopposed to wear the ring,because the child is no longer alive?are u a woman?have u ever given birth?isf so,why are u so judgemental and hard?are u a man?not much of a man then,no clue.i have nothing but respect for not only my deceased fiancees adoptive parents,but also the mother,who had mental challenges and could not raise him.she made hard choices,and did her best,a young woman,father took off-she knew she wasnt adequate to raise him,she did all she could to provide him with care and love.she deserves every prayer,and no contempt.ps-should a widow remove her wedding ring because her husband is gone?my grandmother proudly wore her ring till the day she died.would u have said"doesnt matter now,take it off'?
2006-09-17 12:31:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lyn K 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually we have had a few mothers at our shop that either gave up the baby or actually lost the baby during the pregnancy. I would even recommend an engraving within the ring with a message.
We have a site online as well: www.mothersfamilyrings.com
2006-09-20 16:54:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Vetofunk 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
A mother is someone who has given birth to a child. So as she has achieved this enormous and fantastic thing, of course she can wear the ring! Who the hell are you to judge?? Go worry about something more important, like where to get an education.
2006-09-17 12:21:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by stepfordswiss 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes I think she has a right to wear a mothers ring. Does this bother you cause U are the adoptive parent???
2006-09-17 12:29:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by jwilson704 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, it will always be her child but if she did not care about the child at all and had no reason to give him/her up then i think she shouldn't be wearing a mother's ring because if she is so excited about wearing a ring, why doesn't she have her child?
2006-09-17 12:20:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, certainly she does. She gave birth to a child then she gave it up so the child could have a better life than what she could give it. That's a good mother, if you ask me.
Why would you begrudge her that and why would you even care? Why are you so small and petty? I feel sorry for you!
2006-09-17 12:19:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by I ♥ AUG 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO if she gave it up for adoption it isn't hers any longer. I don't thinkthat is fair to the adoptive mother. But I think it may depend on why she gave it up, some reasons are better then othersbut over all i would say not shw shouldn't be wearing it.. At least that is my opinion.
2006-09-17 12:19:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by luckystar53 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Just because she gave the baby up for adoption doesn't mean she did not give birth. Good grief, lighten up.
2006-09-17 12:26:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by bubu 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
she gave the child up so someone could give the child a life she could not. That does not mean she is not the mother and always will be.
2006-09-17 14:33:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by -------- 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Does this question reference any "she" in particular or is it just that you are mad in general about adoption and want to punish someone who gave up their child that way?
2006-09-17 12:20:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Rich Z 7
·
2⤊
0⤋