2006-09-17 05:04:30 · 13 answers · asked by jimtheglassmaster 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
We don`t know
2006-09-17 05:06:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most probably not. Al Gore would not have put in a team of Neo-Cons in the White House. Without them there, those Arabs would probably not have been funded or assisted in the operation. Further, A terrorist attack practice run would not have been scheduled on the very same day that the real thing would be happening, so our fighter jets would not have been ordered, by our V.P. **** Cheney, to "stand down" and allow the attack to happen. This is the kind of thing our government usually only does to destabilize and seize control of other countries, who would of thought a bunch of Neo-Cons would use the same technique on our country.
Also, keep in mind, that many Americans are outraged that this has happened, in our country. They are doing most everything they can to fix the problem. If they do a little too much, our new laws (Patriot Act) put in by this new government (Bush Team and congress), will allow the government to take us and incarcerate us, on just suspicion of sympathizing with the enemy.
The best we can do is to try to carefully inform our citizens of what is happening here. You can help too, since you are not bound by the same laws we are, you can help expose the truth. Somethings are outright illegal for us to research or talk about. For example, we are not allowed to research into how those terrorists were funded: That would give us the best idea as to who was really behind the attack.
2006-09-17 12:09:11 · answer #2 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Open your mind. The fact behind 9/11 is to defame Islam and its followers. The jews lobby present in US want to stop the acceptance of Islam in the west. This is the only fact behind 9/11
2006-09-17 05:07:16 · answer #3 · answered by eitemad_eitemad 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Almost definitely. The terrorists had planned 9/11 for years before the attacks. Do you think they would have suddenly changed their minds because we had a different president?
2006-09-17 05:16:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It wouldn't matter who was president. The terrorists attacked American targets 4 or 5 times when Clinton was president
2006-09-17 05:07:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It was already being planned, and the systems that were in place (that failed to prevent the attacks) would not have been changed by Gore.
2006-09-17 05:07:09 · answer #6 · answered by Nate 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes... the attacks were planned against the American way of living not an specific president or political party. And also the bureaucracy that our government is known for was what did not let our government agencies act against the threats that they saw it was not a matter of any president in power.
2006-09-17 05:12:31 · answer #7 · answered by wanna_help_u 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably. I don't think it was a presidential failure at that time. The failure has been not applying the recommendations of the 9/11 comission since then.
2006-09-17 05:08:19 · answer #8 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and our response would have cause more attacks because Gore is a nutless coward.
2006-09-17 05:07:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES! As with Bush, he would have been in office for only about Six Months. Too Late!
2006-09-17 05:07:41 · answer #10 · answered by Sentinel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I even have the sensation that we could be in greater powerful shape, individually. Iraq does no longer have happened. They never attacked us. undeniable and easy. that could have stored us some (hundred) billion money.
2016-12-12 09:57:28 · answer #11 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋