That'll lead to chaos & nothing will ever get done because there'll be too much disagreements & politking.
2006-09-17 04:35:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kevin F 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Used to be like that for the first two elections under the constitution. The founding fathers saw too much disagreement and decided to change it.
2006-09-17 04:40:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because you've received each and every large major swing state, and your opponent has received none. because your opponent has informed Florida and Michigan voters to bypass to hell, yet be positive you vote for me in November. because 10 states your opponent received voted republican by employing over 15% very last election, regardless of in case you turn 5% of the voters, you nonetheless lose the state. finally because your opponent has spent over $seven-hundred,000 luring large delegates for your $2 hundred,000 and nonetheless trails you.
2016-11-27 20:07:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that would be a nice except the party doesnt run, the party selects a candidate that runs.
2006-09-17 04:20:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by S H I R A Z 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's the way it was until 1804.
2006-09-17 04:29:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wego The Dog 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
LOL that is the only way a damnocrat will get in office!
2006-09-17 04:46:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a liberal idea. Let's don't hurt anyones feelings. Let's don't have any losers.
2006-09-17 04:25:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by babe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would encourage the assassination of presidents.
2006-09-17 04:24:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jack S. Buy more ammo! 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Prison torture & deport all liberals. Start today today
2006-09-17 05:39:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋