2006-09-17 03:46:41 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Weather
Such an enormous undertaking is practically impossible and would make little difference as the harmful effects of producing the energy required to make the ice would more than offset the cooling ability of the ice.
2006-09-17 23:14:52 · answer #1 · answered by LenV 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they in basic terms stepped forward the technologies to degree the volume of Arctic ice contained in the 1970s. on the grounds that the at that ingredient they have been panicking about global cooling, you would possibly want to anticipate the ice at that ingredient might want to nicely be thicker than it really is now. The globe has actually warmed and as you would possibly want to anticipate, it fairly is melted some ice. The question is - will it proceed to get warmth as Al Gore's action picture anticipated or will it fairly is larger like the UN IPCC form or will it as a replace bypass correct right into a cooling era? Of the three, i imagine of we are depending on the third danger, sensible to severe cooling lasting for some years and with plenty worse consequences than warming. I anticipate the chorus to %. up that track contained in the subsequent 3 hundred and sixty 5 days or so if it fairly is actual, yet i imagine of they are going to discover the in basic terms answer is for the UN to bypass ahead and take over what you would possibly want to and may want to't do on a customary putting out position, reminiscent of with warming.
2016-11-27 20:06:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't afford to ship an icecube right now.
Seriously....all my E-bay customers are complaining cause they are not recieving their goods.
Paypals Fault.
God be with us all.
Great question.....global warming is a scam though.
Just for the ignorant to have something to do.
See ya.
Frozen ice Rules the Universe.
2006-09-17 04:00:03 · answer #3 · answered by Richard L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the global warming is not just about ice melting, all the weather changes from the last 10 years are "thanks"to that.
making ice will not save anyone, maybe just coastal cities.
2006-09-17 03:51:13 · answer #4 · answered by bizkit_ 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The means of creation of the ice would cause more greenhouse gasses
2006-09-17 03:50:53 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you have a brother named George W. Bush?
2006-09-17 15:19:15 · answer #6 · answered by Isles1015 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whoever said there is no such thing as a stupid question, obviously didn't have this question in mind.
2006-09-17 03:54:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting proposision, but I think it would be really expensive
2006-09-17 03:58:41 · answer #8 · answered by nobody 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
boy you certainly haven't thought this through
2006-09-17 08:38:17 · answer #9 · answered by bprice215 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
watch an inconvenient truth. youll find your answer there.
2006-09-17 05:57:02 · answer #10 · answered by neil d 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋