i know the question looks silly, but i think the world relies on balance so for every bad thing that happens somthing good happens, if you take somthing bad out, chances are it would be replaced by somthing bad so is it worth changing anything
2006-09-17 03:38:10 · 16 answers · asked by gavbant 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No! Because then every person that did not agree with my change would be up my a** arguing and bickering about it. This is why I feel the President has one of the most hardest jobs in the world. First one is PARENTING.....
2006-09-17 03:58:53 · answer #1 · answered by always 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that there is a conflict here. You say for every bad thing that happens, something good happens. Then you say if you take something bad out, chances are it would be replaced by something bad. I disagree. If you take something bad out, it will [hopefully] be replaced by something good.
On a small scale, alcoholics are told to replace the time drinking with something else to fill that time - something positive. Same with smokers.
So - we could start by replacing Bush - surely there isn't another one out there. We've already had 2 of them, and they were both duds. So it can only go up from there.
I think that we should also pull the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. There has been more useless loss of life there than there ever was in 9/11, and it hasn't solved a thing. Infringing on their religion and countries has not made a dent in terrorism. In fact it has made it worse. Bring the guys home, and let them fight terrorism on their own turf.
2006-09-17 03:47:48 · answer #2 · answered by theophilus 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The world is worth changing, because there are many ways in which to improve it.
1) Convince Muslims not to use 'by the sword' Jihad, and do it the right way, by preaching with words
2) Make America stop butting in on anything and everything
3) Abolish the U.N. because, if we are going to have a world government, it needs to stop being a meaningless piece of crap, and be something that has real power, not something that relies on America and Britain to enforce it with the threat of nuclear war
2006-09-17 03:46:22 · answer #3 · answered by bobsanderson92 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think with those powers, people would use it selfishly. Somebody with those powers might think something is totally wrong with some issue, and change it. It would have a detrimental effect on the world. For instance, what if someone doesn't like a particular religion, because they think they're wrong, and gets rid of it. What would happen?
2006-09-17 03:47:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would if I could but things are so bad and we just keep making them worse so at this point the world cannot change even if we wanted it too.
2006-09-17 03:47:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Right, I would go back in time and abolish all religeons. Just imagine what a happy place it would be if no one thought their god was the coolest. Just lots of people all being forced to get along here and now.
2006-09-17 04:17:19 · answer #6 · answered by medic 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if i could change the world i would make all people tolerant of eachother and eachothers beliefs etc... change it to a live and let live world... although im sure somewhere someone would find an arguement to start a war
2006-09-17 09:18:26 · answer #7 · answered by tikketiboo 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I could go back in history and stop the development of religion - all religions I would.
No need to say any-more.
2006-09-17 08:56:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps in the long run your theory might hold, but I'm not so optimistic. And do you mean the world (as in earth) or the people in it?
2006-09-17 03:42:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would be insane not to change the world if it was within my ablility and didn't change a few things.
2006-09-17 03:57:23 · answer #10 · answered by mindrizzle 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋