2006-09-17 03:30:24 · 16 answers · asked by S H I R A Z 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes. Most definitely !
2006-09-17 03:32:20 · answer #1 · answered by tysavage2001 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Once again, it's misleading. Nothing was given to North Korea by the U.S. North Korea, Iran and Libya got their nuclear programs from our allies in Pakistan. Not only did they get the know how, but they also got equipment and man power to help things along.
And Bill Clinton did not "give" China any nuclear secrets. They were stolen. He wasn't informed until 2 years after the investigation started. The only thing he may be guilty of is accepting money for his re-election and his defense funds from the Chinese.
Once again, an uninformed con spreading lies and rumors. Next time, actually have proof of what you accuse someone of instead of the misinformation fed to you by the likes of Limbaugh and Coulter.
2006-09-17 10:46:20 · answer #2 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Get your facts straight.
Clinton offered nuclear reactor technology - a type of light-water reactor that could not really be used for the enrichment of Uranium to anything close to weapons grade.
North Korea (along with Iran and Libya), got their technology from a renegade Pakistani named A.Q. Khan. Khan is currently under a very open "house arrest" in Pakistan, allowed to stay free because Bush didn't push for his arrest, preferring to keep the cooperation of the Pakistani government.
I truly wish this forum could be a place to exchange ideas and thought-out opinions, but you seem to be intent on turning it into a middle-school locker room where uninformed people toss "your mamma" jokes back and forth. What a waste.
Now I'll return to ignoring all your posts, unless you actually have a real comment one of these days.
2006-09-17 11:18:31 · answer #3 · answered by Steve 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is an interesting and revealing question! If Bill Clinton had really done so, as you say, then Hilary Clinton, if she assumes the office of Presidency, can or may indeed do so!
2006-09-17 10:55:20 · answer #4 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We need to set the record straight on this one. Bill Clinton SOLD the secrets to China. China probably sold them to Iran. Hillary is toast, so she is a non issue.
2006-09-17 10:36:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
'Nuke secrets"....better look again. I think what B Clinton 'gave' to the Chinese actually was old and outdated missle guidance technology...no nuke secrets, your information is faulty
2006-09-17 10:35:26 · answer #6 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, of course and Bush traded nuclear secrets with India for Mangoes!! So your point is??
2006-09-17 10:43:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
well, bill did that because nothing tastes better than a cooked north korean (a bit like chicken) and better than hillary clintons cooking, plus obviously the secrets must not have been so good considering they cant get it to work, one day you might here a boom and N. korea will be a crater.......Hillary doesnt like iran, they kill people who want the same sex.....
2006-09-17 10:34:29 · answer #8 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Since the repubs help the weapons makers by causing wars do you think they will ever stop?
2006-09-18 01:38:50 · answer #9 · answered by trl_666 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now you must be fair to Bill Clinton. He was too preoccupied with Monica to pay much attention to world affairs. He could only use one head at a time.
2006-09-17 10:36:30 · answer #10 · answered by festus_porkchop 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I can see you are hopeful since they both suck, it is a reasonable assumption.
I suggest that maybe "Dubbya" should give both N Korea & Iran free samples launched from our MX systems.
USA! USA! USA! USA!
2006-09-17 10:34:56 · answer #11 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋