English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

The very ones that America put food on there tables out of my hard earned tax money and they still hate USA so the whole middle east is to blame for the 9/11 attacks and Bill Clinton for being such a coward and worthless President this country has ever seen.

2006-09-17 01:04:53 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 5 0

United States and the Pentagon is to blame because America help Afghanistan secretly to fight the Russian invasion during the 1980's. Russia lost the war, so they left and so as the U.S., Afghanistan did not get any help from any country after the war, and so they produce this kind of people like Osama Bin Laden. The U.S. has been warned before several times about the threat of Al-qaeda under Osama Bin Laden. But without enough funds for the CIA to carry out their mission, the threat was just ignored or just did not pay too much attention until America was attack on SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.

2006-09-17 03:14:13 · answer #2 · answered by anobangtanong 3 · 0 0

Well yes indirectly it was America, or in fact some Americans, that probably include Chaney , Rumsfield , Bush and others connected with Haliburton and the Defense and Oil industries as the record shows that Bin Laden from the Mujahadeen was actually originally financed and trained by the US to destabilise the Russian Backed Afghani Government at the time. It should be noted that they (the US Administrations) also originally trained and financed Gaddafi and Saddam Hussien amongst others, those being the most notable of those that subsequently turned on their "masters".
If in fact Bin Laden and or other Muslims were the financiers or Principals of this act it should be noted that the intitial cause of their motivations would be Religious.
If you read the wiki on 911 conspiacies one has to realise that there are many factors that have not been addressed in reports or findings or disclosures to the public so we will never know the full facts or whom was to truly blame but.... If it was not the CIA or the Bush Administration directly they somehow either complicitly or through stupidity contributed to the final outcome.

2006-09-17 01:12:42 · answer #3 · answered by crazee b 1 · 2 3

Bush and company in cahoots with bin laden with whom there is a long standing business arrangement - arbusto oil. And Jet fuel has a burning temp of around 300 degrees C, with a maximum of around 950 degrees, this maximum is only obtained in an oxygen rich atmosphere. Within the wtc there was a lot of black smoke, indicating poor oxygenation and low temp burning - the massive fire balls on the outside of the building were the burning of the vast majority of the fuel contained within the wings of the planes. Steel melts at 1500 degrees plus, and if someone can explain to me how there was molten steel pouring down the side of the building many floors below the impact area I would be most grateful. To me this looked like a thermite fire, to cause initial weakening of the structure.

2006-09-17 01:54:45 · answer #4 · answered by Allasse 5 · 1 1

The rest of America has known for 5 years already . Where were YOU ?

2006-09-17 11:36:33 · answer #5 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0 0

It's highly likely that the nameless, faceless power brokers who really rule our country behind the scenes were responsible for this disaster. "They" needed a reason to illegally and unconstitutionally order Bush to invade Iraq, and killing a few thousand Americans was simply "collateral damage".
They had to invade Iraq for two reasons: 1) to settle the score and finish the Bush family's personal vendetta against Hussein, and 2) because Dick Cheney wants all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands so his Exxon-Mobil buddies can all get richer and richer and richer.
___________________________________________________
Check out the new blog: BUSHWACKER!
www.blogspot.com
http://al-aback.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________

Something had to happen to enrage the gullible conservative and liberal ditto heads sufficiently to allow them to support Bush's decision to go to war. That terrorist act accomplished two things: 1) It gave "them" a reason to invade Iraq and capture all that OIL (by the way, the U.S.A. is currently building the largest embassy in the world on 104-acres of prime land in downtown Baghdad. Why? Because we intend to be there for decades, until we've sucked all the OIL out of Iraq's sands).
2) It provided one more way to boost the obscene profits of our huge military-industrial complex (after World War II, industrialists recognized how profitable war could be, and they were not about to stop manufacturing armaments, fighter jets, tanks, bombs, and missiles just for the sake of peace. So "they" involved the U.S. in the Korean Conflict; the Cold War; the Cuban Missile Crisis; the Vietnam War; and Desert Storm all for PROFIT. Now "they" (the wealthy elitists and industrialists, the lobbyists, special interest groups, and big business) needed a rock-solid reason for starting one more very profitable 'war'.

It's time for Americans to get off their computers, put down the remote, and DEMAND to take their country back. -RKO-

2006-09-17 02:51:43 · answer #6 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1 0

I am an Arab. I am sure that Al Qaeeda did that. But CIA knew that and let it happen just in NY. But we didn't see it happening in the white house or in the pentagon. Also I think that CIA helped in planting explosives in these twin towers!

2006-09-17 05:42:27 · answer #7 · answered by MagicWand 3 · 0 0

The bottom line to this question is the people who hijacked the planes & flew them into the buildings. Then from there you could include the people who supported these terrorists financially. And on and on, heck we could even include the parents of these terrorists who had them.

2006-09-17 01:08:46 · answer #8 · answered by curiousgeorge 5 · 4 0

How about the hijackers who flew three planes in to buildings killing thousands of innocent civilians, robbing children of their mothers and fathers?

2006-09-17 01:51:21 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0 0

all you people who say the cia/america tht freaking BS! they would never do such a horrible thing and kill thousands of everyday heroes and civillians

2006-09-17 07:46:10 · answer #10 · answered by novaicedogs9 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers