English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We know for SURE that Bush at lest knew in advance that 9/11 is going to happen. He did not even react sharply after hearing the news. His reaction was very calm and calculated. The WTC towers could not vertically enclave by hit of a plane. The building design had that provision of a hit by the plane. Bush used the incidence just like Puttin who attacked Chechnya after demolition of two buildings in Russia! He blamed Chechen Muslims while everyone knew it was a KGB drama.
Bush then dropped 20,000 heavy bombs on the heads of civilians, he used highly dnagerous urnaium bullets, Napalm bombs and restored world's 60% heroin to the delight of underground drug mafia. Then he blatently lied about WMDs in Iraq and again killed thousnads of innocent people. Whart he is not telling that Saddam is a NON MUSLIM and an agent of CIA from age 16. In short Bush is directly responsible for killing innocent people and persons in Uniform of USA! Why he has not been punished for so many crimes?

2006-09-17 00:14:16 · 17 answers · asked by pathowiz 3 in News & Events Other - News & Events

17 answers

I completely share your outrage and the only response I have is to say that I wish there were more like you in our country. It is heartnening to see that some people HAVE been paying attention over the years and they CAN see the deception.

2006-09-17 00:19:26 · answer #1 · answered by mustihearthis 4 · 0 3

First of all, I vote Democrat and am certainly no fan of Bush. But here's a couple things:

1) Bush's reaction after hearing the first plane hit really shouldn't be that surprising. What was he supposed to do, jump out of his seat and panic? If you answer 'yes' to that question, why? In the beginning no one was sure that was it was a terrorist attack. When Bush was sitting there, he probably figured it was just some accident. Why would he think otherwise? He had no reason to assume the worst, because none of us -- including him -- had any idea that something like that could happen. Which leads me to my next point...

2) How do you know "for SURE" that Bush knew about the terrorist attacks in advance? Did he get a memo saying that there might be a terrorist attack in the near future, or did he get a memo saying "MR. PRESIDENT, 19 HIJACKERS WILL ATTACK SEVERAL AMERICAN CITIES ON TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 11 2001 STARTING AT 8:46 AM"? Somehow I think the first scenario is true. Saying that he knew exactly what was going to happen before it happened -- and even worse, that he deliberately didn't act -- is total speculation on your part.

3) Sure, the WTC towers probably had some sort of safety measure against being hit by a plane. A small plane. You think those designers had any idea that a plane of THAT size would ever strike the towers dead-on? Besides, the 9/11 conspiracy theories have been debunked time and time again -- I don't know which one you believe in, but do a little research and open your eyes, and you'll discover that none of them hold water. (People find it too hard to believe that the impact of a huge plane and burning jet fuel could take down a building... but they have no problem believing that explosives in each of the buildings is what REALLY caused them to fall -- explosives that somehow were planted inside each of the towers without any of the staff or police noticing. It's ludicrous.)

4) I strongly oppose the war but you cannot make the claim that he "blatantly lied" about the WMD's. It's not a lie if you believe it to be true, which he did. Granted, that doesn't make it any better, and I certainly hope he's held accountable in some way, but you're making it sound like he WANTED to send our troops over there because he WANTED to see them die, or something like that. Come on, man. That's ridiculous and you know it.

There's left-wing and then there's too left-wing, buddy. Come back over to sanity before you fall off the edge.

2006-09-17 00:34:23 · answer #2 · answered by . 7 · 2 0

1. He had absolutely no foreknowledge of the attacks of 9/11.
2. His reaction? He was stunned!
3. Many expert architects have said the WTC towers were not designed to withstand such an impact.
4. How do you know that it was 20,000 bombs?
5. The "bullets" were DEPELETED uranium...essentially lead.
6. Napalm hasn't been used since Viet Nam.
7. Bush has nothing to do with heroin trade. But there are some MUSLIM countries that do.
8. WMDs were found in Iraq. Several hundred artillery shells filled with sarin and mustard gas.
9. Saddam Hussien IS a muslim and was NOT a CIA agent.
10. I do not live in Russia so I cannot address the outrageous claims you are making about that.

All your claims are nothing but pure fabrications.

2006-09-17 00:24:55 · answer #3 · answered by Albannach 6 · 2 0

Jesus Christ, how many terrorist sympathizers are on this friggin' website?? Don't you realize that this is exactly how the terrorists want you to think? Blame our government over them. Do a google search on terrorist activities and see how many hits you get.


1. http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html

2. How was Bush supposed to react, go running and screaming?

3. If the US government planned, or knew about 9/11, why not plant WMD's in Iraq, to take the heat off of going to war in what many think was an unjust war? Planting WMD's in Iraq would be much easier than planning and carrying out 9/11.

4. Why would the government do this? It crippled the US economy for sometime, and it has yet to fully recover.

5. People like you like to have these thoughts because you feel you are going against the mainstream, and it makes you feel intelligent.

Stop blaming the victim and point your outrage at the real terrorists.

2006-09-17 00:39:59 · answer #4 · answered by JONES99679 3 · 1 0

Everything Bush has done and will do (There's 2 years left. So little time so many jihadists to kill ---I guess we'll have to go nuclear!) was started by Islam on the morning of 9-11.

The blood is on Islam's hands, not his. Not ours. He will not be punished for it in this life or the next, but rather received as a hero in both!

2006-09-17 08:07:17 · answer #5 · answered by caesar x 3 · 0 0

Wake up, brother. He won't be punished because he is the president of USA . Beside that he has got a nice fake smile!

2006-09-17 05:52:14 · answer #6 · answered by MagicWand 3 · 0 1

He is a tool of the world controllers. When he is seen as not valuable anymore to their agenda he will be discarded and "classified" information will be leaked. He will be replaced by another puppett who will do the same crap.

2006-09-17 00:23:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Wait till he comes back to civilian (ordinary life) life

2006-09-17 00:21:42 · answer #8 · answered by Sam X9 5 · 0 3

just wait for the next election

2006-09-17 06:55:34 · answer #9 · answered by Zoe 5 · 0 1

Because he is the one who thinks he is doling out the pubishment. Like all dictators, he will come unstuck one day.

2006-09-17 00:18:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers