http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=405360&in_page_id=1770
2006-09-16 22:10:36 · 19 answers · asked by http://hogshead.pokerknave.com/ 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If that is true why bother waisting money on the police force? sounds like the start of anarchy to me.
2006-09-16 22:23:51 · answer #1 · answered by stevoledevo 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If criminals are aware, that if they speed / drive dangerously the Police will not follow, this will only encourage the criminal to do dangerous things so they will not be chased. If the criminals try and run, and have to be pursued anything that happens in that pursuit should be added to the list of charges that they face, even I would go as far as saying, if a pursuing Police officer caused an injury to someone or damage as a result of the pursuit, whilst I fully support Health & Safety Regulations at work how can we get these to apply to Criminals, get them to Register at the local job shop? ('Car Thief own hours required for the West Bromwich Area, arsonists welcome !!!!') or better still, get them Tattoed with their crimes across the forehead in flourescent ink !
2006-09-16 22:34:32 · answer #2 · answered by tr1gger123 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did they ever have it in the first place.
Real softies job now, driving like maniacs in patrol cars, you name it and they get away with it.
I was in a queue behind one the other day when school children, walking on the pavement, threw a sweet paper on the road, the officer in the car shouted from his car to pick it up. The person concerned duly picked up the paper, and as the queue moved on simply threw the paper to the ground again.
So much for law enforcement.
2006-09-17 01:50:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When it takes six plain clothed officers go to interview Cherie Blair about physically abusing a child in a joking situation, then you know that the common victim of real crime does not have a chance
Police officers really are PC's now.
More jobs for the Woolly Jumper brigade is not going to solve real crime or come to that any crime.
2006-09-16 22:40:27 · answer #4 · answered by Useless 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep. They have. Should a fireman no longer go near a fire in case they wet someone inside. Should the emergency services no longer cut people out of crashed cars in case they damage their clothes. We have been made fools of by Blair and the New Labour advisers. The people who are advisers to the Blair government and they are many have to be seen to do something. I think they have a competition to see who can get the most pathetic and ridicules PC directive out to the public.
2006-09-16 22:23:23 · answer #5 · answered by deadly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for decades the police were banned from taking an energetic section in politics. This has consistently been taken to disguise club of any political party. Naming the BNP is not in basic terms unnecessary yet very risky. What different activities will be named as flawed?
2016-11-27 19:53:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When will the time come when we don't have a police force? If this is what is happening why bother having a force at all, they already can't do this or that or the flaming other.
2006-09-16 22:26:21 · answer #7 · answered by Jayne 2 (LMHJJ) 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What did you expect from Labour? Best of pals with paedophiles, etc. Criminals have never had so much protection or "human rights legislation" to look after their twisted interests.
I will be voting BNP next election.
2006-09-16 22:20:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is totally fecking stupid!!!
The PC brigade want locked up, then deported to some very cold remote island off Scotland or Wales and left to rot in their pathetic stupid lives.
This make me SO fecking angry!!!
2006-09-17 02:07:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pop a cap into their backside and they won't run so fast. Here in Detroit the local gendarmes might fire a warning shot into their cranium.
2006-09-16 22:20:35 · answer #10 · answered by maxinebootie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋