English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

CS_2 + 3O_2 → CO_2 + 2SO_2

2006-09-16 18:55:43 · answer #1 · answered by Brenmore 5 · 0 0

the authentic difficulty is that the gov't and media are making CO2 out to be a significant pollutant or toxin (a "undesirable guy"), even as it obviously isn't. A pollutant, legitimately, is a chemical substance it really is risky to living platforms, something like sulfar dioxide or carbon monoxide or benzene... frequently guy-made, regardless of the reality that there are exceptions...which comprise sulfur dioxide from volcanoes and rotting flora. because it occurs, CO2 is a organic subtance, expelled by employing animals and flora, and absorbed by employing photosynthetic flora in the time of one 1/2 of their respiration cycle. it isn't poisonous, and were one in a position to push a button and spoil all of this chemical compount in minute, shall we be in a "international of damage," as our provide of oxygen might want to quickly disappear, and all existence on the planet might want to succumb. those who rant about AGW (and ACC) are both untutored in technology or have some hidden agenda. they are rightly labled Alarmits. not withstanding the final favor for understand of ecological criteria (and a swap faraway from fossil fuels and nuclear capacity, and the favor for quick progression of different technique of propulsion), those human beings recognize not of what they communicate. There are about a dozen clarification why the "international Warming" hypothesis isn't supported by employing technology. regrettably, almost everybody has "inebriated the Kool-help." very few of the topics with this hypothesis: a million. Warming leads CO2 advance. 2. the biggest "greenhouse gas" is water vapor. 3. photo voltaic interest is the most efficient "motive force" of temperature substitute. 4. The archives were cherry-picked and manipulated in an major thanks to provide the apparently cataclysmic difficulty...which has not materialized. 5. The fashions used are complicated, contain significant assumptions, and are flawed. 6. even as the dire predictions at the on the spot are not fulfilled, the alarmists hem and haw and are available up with stupid excuses. Like non secular cult-contributors, they INSIST on their factors, contained in the actual reality of contradiction. 7. The Antarctic ice-%. has grown thicker over modern years, except for one small section.

2016-11-27 19:46:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

CS2 + 3O2 -> CO2 + 2SO2

2006-09-16 18:52:27 · answer #3 · answered by CH4 3 · 0 0

CS2+3O2=CO2 +2SO2.

2006-09-16 18:39:47 · answer #4 · answered by zee_prime 6 · 0 0

CS2+ 3O2 =CO2+ 2SO2

2006-09-16 19:35:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers