-president bush never lied about anything
>we did find WMDs in iraq last april
-some 500 containers of mustard gas
>Bush said that we had reason to believe WMDs were in iraq
-the CIA told him that
>Bush just did what he had to do to protect America
-Bush isn't the one keeping us in iraq
>we are there because we have work to do
>Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
-gives congress power to pull troops out after 90 days
>if they feel the war is unjust
>checks and balances
-president doesn't have power to do very much
-what you say bush did wrong was agreed by liberal congress
-There is NO conspiracy in our government
>its just ridiculous to think that
>again checks and balances
-it is impossible for there to be a conspiracy
just some "misunderstandings" liberals on this site tend to have about our government.
feel free to email me at bolson_07@yahoo.com with any questions
2006-09-16 17:10:11 · 17 answers · asked by THEBurgerKing 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That is the truth. Its easier to hate Bush then go to the root of problems.
High gas prices? MUST BE BUSH! unemployment? BUSH 9/11? BUSH economy? BUSH Hurricanes? BUSH Democrats running Louisiana not rebuilding? BUSH Terrorism? BUSH Iran getting nukes? BUSH Violence in the middle east? BUSH Detroit Lions losing? BUSH
2006-09-16 17:17:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You lie -
Bush lied on television a year and a half ago when he said they always got warrants for wire taps. The NYTIMES made him come clean. Fact.
Some older gas filled artillery rounds were found, but none were useable because the gas degrades, and Saddam had no way to effectively deliver them. Quote from the link below: "Neither the military nor the White House nor the CIA considered the shells to be evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons" Fact.
Checks and balances don't work when the Congress and the Administration are rubber stamping each other. Bush only vetoed one bill since he's been in office. The Republicans rarely let a Democratic bill even come to the floor for a vote. Facts.
Now go f**k yourself.
2006-09-16 17:42:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When you say the war was agreed to by a liberal Congress-maybe you are the one who needs to be set straight. Republicans are the majority in Congress. That is exactly why there have been no checks & balances.
In November, if the Republicans lose the House or the Senate, or both, you will see the investigations start. And well they need to be. No one, not even the Commander in Chief, is above the law.
I'm sure you must think I'm a Liberal. Let me assure you, I'm not. I am not affiliated with either party. I am not a Bush basher. But I do think many of his policies need to be investigated. Checks & balances.
2006-09-16 19:21:52 · answer #3 · answered by Nancy L 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You got your facts wrong. It was sarin gas they found and they were in such a bad state that there is no way to weaponize them. Besides, they were made prior to the first gulf war, therefore very possibly provided to them by...yes, you guessed it, the USA.
In fact, if you had actually followed the news, George Bush has now actually admitted that there were no WMD in Iraq, at the time of the invasion. This is exactly what the WMD inspectors were saying, all along!
You probalby have your reasons to support him, but most of the world does not.
2006-09-16 17:37:19 · answer #4 · answered by Mike V 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nice laundry list. Where did you get that, the RNC website?
The "wmd" we found in April was some old decomposed Saran gas (not mustard) and it was so dangerous that if the whole thing was dropped on NYC 2 or three people might have gotten a headache. So are you saying 2800 American services men and women are dead and thousands more injured over some old gas that was not even poison anymore?
Is that the best you can do? Nice try.
2006-09-16 17:23:05 · answer #5 · answered by arvis3 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
People always forget about the checks and balances in our government. I think it makes people feel better to just blame this all on President Bush. The mainstream media seems to pick and choose information that they wish to emphasize and leave the other facts and the other side of the story out of the mix.
2006-09-16 17:18:43 · answer #6 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
... uh you sound pretty confused...
Bush said we're going in to get the WMD made since the Gulf War... haven't found any of those yet...
and I'm sure Bush has never lied about anything ever... sure it could happen... hahaha
and the "liberal congress" is a Republican majority... don't you hate those liberal Republicans... I know I do...
and since Bush let's people oversee every step of everything and never acts without a warrant, sure conspiracies are impossible and checks and balances are obvious...
hahaha... and we have misunderstandings?
2006-09-16 17:17:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Dubya lied about Iraq
WMDs were found according to Dubya News. I mean Fox news
Dubya protects his pocket and his partners' pockets, that means we have to work for Halliburton.
It's not easy to cover the sun with a finger.
2006-09-16 19:21:36 · answer #8 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, our friend Bush would NEVER lie to the infidel Americans
Thank you for forgetting about me in Afganistan. INSTEAD, you invaded Iraq...HA. We attacked you.....and you invaded another country.
Thank you for forgetting about us, and taking out a leader that was no threat to you!
Did you find those WMD's yet?
2006-09-16 17:18:27 · answer #9 · answered by ? 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"again checks and balances"
I love this, it is used by everyone who wants to show that there can not be a conspiracy, right up to the point where it's the other person party in the conspiracy :LOL:
2006-09-16 17:35:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋