She is not liberal enough for me.
But she would be a strong leader.
She is much smarter than BUSH! well now so is my nine year old!
She can only improve this shoddy state of the union. She is smarter than many other senators, and all the women in the US will vote for her because they cant stand the mess the BUSH guy is making with his paterfamilias, autocratic, totalitarian, lying dictator warmongering regime.
2006-09-16 17:58:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by meldorhan 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
NO – I am a democrat but I generally vote the person first and the party only when I can not decide between the two. She has not earned the right to be our president (but then there have been a lot of others in office who should not be). I feel we need someone in office who knows and understands the real issues. Someone who has walked on the same side of the street as we have, worked for a living, worried about health care, gas prices, food and shelter, and getting an education. How can a person like her really understand when she has never felt the cold of winter, or hunger, laid sick in bed without money to see a doctor? America will be great again when it finds a president “of the people and for the people." It is time we stopped putting parties into office and elected an American President.
2006-09-16 17:34:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by privateeye4U 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton has made some quite unfavorable selections over the previous couple of weeks. She is down in New Orleans blasting the federal governement, which she is a factor of for his or her continued loss of help for the region. final I checked her social gathering is now in skill and not something has replaced. Then she makes a speech approximately how she has this surprising thought to furnish Pre-okay to little ones interior the internal city, and how this on my own will help families wreck the cycle of poverty. there is already such an company, and that i paintings for it. HEAD commence. it is not a sparkling theory, that is been around for years. This software additionally does not help families wreck the cycle of poverty. Of the 20 little ones in my type 15 of them their mom and dad have been head commence little ones aswell. Very idealistic, yet not a certainty. surprising thought Hillary, next she will let us know that she has this great thought to assist us circulate our protection rigidity around the rustic stated as the line equipment.
2016-10-15 02:04:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Hilliary Clinton would make an excellent dog-catcher and from what I have observed she has all the qualifications.
If you are talking about the Animal Relief Department, then I agree she will make a good President of that Department.
If there are any other such jobs that you would like to see her apply for, I wish her luck.
America has enough trouble just trying to get along, we don't need her to bring our the worse in us.
2006-09-19 14:41:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr.Been there 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. She demonstrated a lack of moral courage when she failed to speak out during the Clinton/Lewinsky affair.
By the way, the issue is not about sex, to me. It is about the fact that neither Hillary, nor Bill, had the moral courage to speak the truth. Such courage is mandatory, in my opinion, for our next president. We have not had a president with that courage since the likes of Kennedy, Carter, and Regan
2006-09-17 00:53:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chuck N 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
That's a tough question. I'd have to see who's she's running against in both the Democratic Primary and in the General Election.
2006-09-20 15:20:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ed A 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not my vote. If she won I would pack up the family and go live in Australia or the Philippines til someone worthwhile came along.
2006-09-17 01:49:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
She is a hypocrite.
She tried to draw up a health care plan in secrecy, which is against federal law
The plan prescribed some eye- popping maximum fines: $5,000 for refusing to join the government- mandated health plan; $5,000 for failing to pay premiums on time; 15 years to doctors who received "anything of value" in exchange for helping patients short-circuit the bureaucracy; $10,000 a day for faulty physician paperwork; $50,000 for unauthorized patient treatment; and $100,000 a day for drug companies that messed up federal filings . . . When told the plan could bankrupt small businesses, Mrs. Clinton sighed, "I can't be responsible for every undercapitalized small business in America."
When a woman complained that she didn't want to get shoved into a plan not of her choosing, the first lady lectured, "It's time to put the common good, the national interest, ahead of individuals."
What was finally proposed involved a massive transfer of the American health industry -- by some accounts now larger than the military-industrial complex -- to a small number of the largest insurance companies and other major corporations. These were companies that had the assets to play the game being offered -- a medical oligopoly that would dispense health-care under the rules of the Fortune 500 rather than according to those of Hipprocrates.
Wal-Mart prospered under Bill Clinton when he was governor and President. Sam Walton and his wife, Helen, were close to the Clintons, and for several years Hillary Clinton, whose law firm represented Wal-Mart, served on the company's board of directors. Yet she advocates and lies to union workers avoiding telling them the truth about the fact she was on the board for Wal-Mart...
When asked if she kept a diary. Her response: "Heavens, no! It could get subpoenaed. I can't write anything." She added that her comments would be used to "go after and persecute every friend of mine, everybody I've ever talked with, everyone I've had a conversation with. ~ It's very sad."
In 1978 Hillary Clinton makes a $44,000 profit on a $2,000 investment in a cellular phone franchise deal that involves taking advantage of the FCC's preference for locals, minorities and women. The franchise is almost immediately flipped to the cellular giant, McCaw.
Two months after commencing the Whitewater scam, Hillary Clinton invests $1,000 in cattle futures. Within a few days she has a $5,000 profit. Before bailing out she earns nearly $100,000 on her investment. Many years later, several economists will calculate that the chances of earning such returns legally were one in 250 million.
Just a few of the reasons....she is NOT fit to be a President.
2006-09-17 02:19:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Q-burt 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
No. I wouldn't be too pissed if she went for VP, but I pray she doesn't win the Democratic nomination for President because not nearly enough people will vote for her and the Democrats will be scewed again in 2008 and we'll have another 4 friggin years of Republican rule.
2006-09-16 21:26:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Reject187 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Never! I always vote - 25 years of voting.
2006-09-16 17:29:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
1⤋