ABSOLUTELY!!
2006-09-16 16:39:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Amina 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes, of course they got cheated. Remember that these players are still kids. Both teams played their hearts out and no team ever deserves an official changing the course of a game. So what if OU had a chance to kick the fieldgoal to win it. With 1:09 left, OU should have had the ball. With the stupid new clock rule, the game is over with 2 or 3 neel downs. OU took 3 calls on the chin. 1 - Oregon touched the ball before 10 yards. 2 - Pass interference called on a tipped pass. 3 - OU actually recovered the onside kick. Oregon fans can argue that they recovered the ball and lost it after the pile up, but if the referees saw this why were two officials digging through trying to find the ball?
2006-09-16 21:45:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by College football fanatic 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
the guy who suggested you have been overvaluing Dixon merely wasn't paying interest final year. i don't understand if i've got ever viewed one participant make any such huge distinction to a minimum of one team. They went from scoring 40 plus a week to suffering to post 10, from dominant undefeated to dropping 4 in row!. this is the unfold: take out the dynamic playmaking QB and the offense will become inept. If Tebow have been given injured and Florida have been forced to put in a professional form backup, like Oregon grew to become into, you may see a similar give way. to respond to your question - Florida misplaced final year to the comparable Michigan team that Oregon beat via 5 td's in Michigan. Florida's greater appropriate than they have been final year, yet greater appropriate adequate? i think of Oregon could win in a squeaker. Oklahoma - A rematch of their classic conflict from 2 years in the past that Oregon gained via a nostril. yet another classic could erupt. a good number of offense, yet i think of ok could be slightly too lots. 40 5-40 two or some thing.
2016-12-15 09:13:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That was one of the worst refereed games i have seen. I mean if you have instant replay and you dont use it right what use is it. Plus even all the announcers were saying the same that OU lost because of those calls. This was ridiculous and OU should get apologies from the referees for that game. Is ridiculous because this will cause them to fall in the standings when they really won the game. Officiating should not determine the outcome of the game.
2006-09-16 17:45:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes and no. An Oregon player did touch the ball on their onside kickoff before the ball had traveled the required 10 yds. But Oregon did go on to score the go ahead TD after that, and Oklahoma had a shot to win it at the end with a FG but Oregon blocked it.
2006-09-16 18:54:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes. Did you watch the replay of the onside kick. OU came up with the ball. How could they give it to Oregon?
2006-09-16 18:57:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Diddly 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why do we need instant replay if the home team will always get the advantage somehow, but anyways he knew what was going on and caused oklahoma a probable BCS bowl, Adrian Peterson His Heisman Which He Deserves, THAT IS BULLSH*T!
2006-09-16 18:14:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Got cheated by the zebras that got paid off. Next time well bring big 12 refs that way calls are corrected, and the better team wins.
2006-09-16 17:27:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Marcus K 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
no, OU is just getting the bad call against them today instead of working for them
2006-09-16 17:32:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Steveo 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
OU blows they are makin the Pac-10 look good even though they are one of the worst confences.
2006-09-16 18:39:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The kick was one thing, but the pass interferance call was absolute b.s. No matter what people say Ducks play "good" in Atzel. In short my answer is yes... yes they did.
2006-09-16 16:42:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by Icarus 2
·
2⤊
0⤋