I have to right a paper on argue for elimination of speed limits?

Question

pleas help me TY.

Answer 1

you could make the point that people could use their own morals to decide how fast that they needed to go, and/or that it is people's freedom as an american that they should be allowed to speed and that speed limits only impede freedom..........oorr uuuhh you could make the point that speed limits cause more problems than solving problems.(police have to take their time and government's money to enforce the speed rules, without speed limits the government would save money on making signs,) i donno good luck on your paper.

Answer 2

You might want to first spell "write" correctly, if you want to do well on a paper assignment. Think about all of the disadvantages and advantages to as many different kinds of people that you can think of, if the speed limits were to be eliminated. And then write your paper, describing these ideas, and decide which make the most sense--that can be your thesis for the paper.

Answer 3

I want to write a paper on an argue for elimination of speed limits? That your question!
Well
-They bother drivers causing more accidents
-The police get a bad name
-It's complicated, certain speeds at certain times causing alot more confusion
-Sometimes drivers have to go slow or fast for certain reasons
and get caught out
-It's a waste of time to make the signs
I recomend you do an exposition, which is:
Statement of position
Background information
Point
Elaboration
Point
ELaboration
Point elaboration
Conclusion
example
Joe is good because he likes to walk
Walking is good for you and you get healthy
Joe walks every day. He has a routine so he will keep fit and healthy and never slump around
Joe likes to walk for good purposes. Joe walks because he wants to deliver messages around and get fit.
Joe never is in somebodies way. Joe always walks to the left and never bothers anyone.
Joe walks every day, he helps himself and the comunity and he never bothers anyone. So therefore Joe is good.
It is actually much longer than this
Hope it helps!

Answer 4

1. use spellcheck.
2. re-read it, because some words that are spelled correctly, are the wrong words for the context. Ex: Right, Write.

3. Several things to look at - how much taxpayer money can be saved with no speed limit signs, police can be used to fight REAL crime, and darwinism laws will get rid of the people too stupid to drive at a reasonable speed.

Answer 5

Sounds like a tough topic. Few actually obey speed limits, but at least it generally keeps people from driving 100 mph all the time. Perhaps you could use the angle that each person is responsible for themselves. But, thereagain, you have to consider the selfish and/or blaming people of the world who find it impossible to be reponsible for themselves. Oh yeah, and work on the spelling and syntax. Bset of luck.

Answer 6

Think about what would be the advantages if there were no speed limit. A lot of countries don't have a speed limit...like the Audubon or however you spell it in Germany....I think it's in Germany.

Answer 7

you have to write, not right, !!!!