English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-16 14:02:49 · 7 answers · asked by Jujeaux 6 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

and it is saturday so let em rip

2006-09-16 14:04:10 · update #1

7 answers

"I see ahead to the 1900's. There will be much wisdom in 3 stooges"

"He who stares at sun for the time goes blinder than a skinny guy screwing a fat woman"

"Fortune cookie is Chinese scam, but wisdom is heard in silence, whatever the Hell that means"

"My parents hate my guru status, which is why I say parents are blind to the wisdom of their children!"

"There has never been a female phophet, and shouldn't be"

"There should be commandments against nagging and cuddling"

2006-09-16 15:09:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The center of his teaching was Morality and it was based on 5 relationship, to wit: father-son, elder-younger brothers, husband -wife, friend -friend, and emperor-subject.

What is missing? I think that " I - neighbor " i.e., conception of 'self' and 'common good' is missing.

Confucius' Moral order was hierarchical (vertical mostly) and horizontal relationship was within clan. This explains why Confucian societies tend to be hierarchical rigid, bossy, and used to neglect public order, always tending to form small circle of clans. This is changing, of course, as the Western Culture's influence on Asia is considerable.

I hope that this opinion helps you. Have a good day.

2006-09-17 00:56:11 · answer #2 · answered by jpkor 1 · 0 0

At 2am lights will always change against you even though nothing is coming the other way.

2006-09-16 21:06:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what he said about when a man reached 30 is true- i NOW know what i can/cannot achieve, and it's easier for me to see the 'truth'.

2006-09-16 21:10:03 · answer #4 · answered by andyheretic 2 · 0 0

Way too many to even think about listing.

2006-09-18 09:39:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

certainly.

2006-09-16 21:33:34 · answer #6 · answered by pyj 4 · 0 0

Oh, hell yes: "...liberals are idiots".

2006-09-16 23:11:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers