This weekend. Do I play
Atlanta Def (tampa bay) or St louis Def (vs San Fran)
or start as my 2nd WR: Darrel Jackson (vs Ariz), Matt Jones (vs Pitt), or Roy Williams (Vs. Bears)
help
2006-09-16 13:48:47 · 17 answers · asked by dunknasty 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Atlanta Def.
Darrel Jackson.
2006-09-16 13:51:37 · answer #1 · answered by DiVenanzo™ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
St Louis D as SF is still turnover prone.
Once again, Jackson gets a tough draw. Antrel Rolle is a physical defender who will play press coverage and try to knock Jackson off his routes early. But Jackson, while not very big or fast, has an excellent burst off the line and is very good at getting initial separation. Rolle will challenge him, but Jackson will get his catches.
He's always Matt Hasselbeck's first option and is a solid No. 2 receiver this week.
Jones didn't practice Saturday with a sore groin. He is listed as probable for Week 2.
It looks like he'll play, but don't expect a big day.
Williams will be matched up against his old Texas teammate, Bears corner Nathan Vasher. The two players went at it constantly at Longhorns practice and had a few skirmishes last season. Things could be different this year because Williams won't be in that predictable West Coast offense and always lined up as the flanker. Also, Williams won't be running nearly as many 'sit-down' routes so he'll be able to use his size and strength to keep Vasher at arm's length. Williams had a disappointing performance in the opener (3 rec, 36 yds).
The bears D is a tough unit to start a WR against.
Go with Darrel Jackson
2006-09-17 00:02:48 · answer #2 · answered by mets9999 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For defense:
Play St. Louis. Frank Gore will not repeat what he did last week, as he has lost his entire left side due to injuries. St. Louis played godly last week against a team that got far in the playoffs and improved in the offseason. Add in the fact that the QB of the Niners is Alex Smith, and St. Louis is a must.
For WR:
Matt Jones right off the bat is a no. This is a Pitt team that held Chris Chambers and the rest of Miami to 0 passing TDs, and 2 INTs. So its up to Jackson and Roy Williams. I'd take Jackson. Arizona has major gaps in their defense, while the Bears have none. Also, the fact that they now have Branch and Burleson should open up the field more and leave man-on-man coverage for Jackson, and he should excell. My rule is never play a WR against Chicago, especially when the QB is like Jon Kitna or something.
so, DEFENSE = St. Louis and WR = Darrel Jackson
good luck
2006-09-16 21:27:20 · answer #3 · answered by c-money 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to this projection site, Matt Jones is ranked 23rd, Darrel Jackson: 14th, and Roy Williams: 34th.
Atlanta's defense is ranked 8th while St. Louis's is 13th.
2006-09-16 21:00:24 · answer #4 · answered by ashkadoodles12345 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
St Louis D - SF's O is not as good as TB (who had a bad wk1)
D Jackson vs. Ariz D, other two D's are better than Az.
2006-09-16 22:09:49 · answer #5 · answered by biggie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
st louis D due to SF's weak passing attack
i'd go w/ jones at WR. jackson just coming back from injury and williams facing a tough D.
2006-09-16 20:57:22 · answer #6 · answered by the greg 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Darrel Jackson (vs Ariz),
if john abraham plays, go w/ atl, but to be safe go with stl
2006-09-16 23:01:06 · answer #7 · answered by the man 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Atlanta and Darrell Jackson. Both should do very well!
2006-09-18 14:26:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi,
I would start Atlanta as the defense and Jackson as your 2nd reciever
2006-09-20 20:47:22 · answer #9 · answered by The Saint 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Atlanta and Darrel
2006-09-20 19:27:46 · answer #10 · answered by gdmantle7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋