2006-09-16 13:36:07 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
exellent idea
2006-09-16 19:35:47 · answer #1 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a great idea. Politics are truly in his soul, that's why he is so effective. He also has his own kind of charisma and inherent people skills. I think Bill Clinton would be successful in just about any political office or forum, and I am sure he misses active involvement on some level. I think America is better off with him in the big picture, not out of it.
2006-09-16 15:59:37 · answer #2 · answered by Desi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not? He spent eight years trying to subordinate the United States to the U.N.; maybe he'd be happier there. 'Course, it won't happen, because they would never choose a citizen of a major world power as Secretary-General.
2006-09-16 18:13:27 · answer #3 · answered by nacmanpriscasellers 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wel now, we've Dubya contained in the White abode and his brother is Governor of Florida. Is that too a lot skill in a unmarried relations. after all, he had the skill to provide his brother the Presidency in 2000. bill and Hillary are wise and function shown they recognize what they are doing. i might want to fairly have them in place of work than the trees who've shown they don't look sturdy at doing something except growing a multitude for some different person to clean up.
2016-11-27 19:29:17 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He got the country out of debt and kept us out of war by being a good diplomat. He went only after the ones who needed to. Not destroying a whole country.
Bush made them mad right off by just daring them to do something. So they did.
He didn't rob from the poor and give to the richest Americans.
He would probably do a good job.
2006-09-16 13:39:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I miss Bill Clinton. I don't care what anybody says- he sure was a better president then the one we have in office now!
2006-09-16 13:43:58 · answer #6 · answered by Amanda 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Can't be much worse than "coffee-cup" Annan. The UN is a pointless waste, so it might as well be Homer Simpson as Secretary-General.
2006-09-16 13:38:41 · answer #7 · answered by missourim43 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it's a much better idea than having Bush for president!
2006-09-16 13:39:45 · answer #8 · answered by willow oak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He certainly would do better than Mz. "COLDFISH" Hillary any day. I don't know why he married her in the first place. Such a waste of a great guy. He deserve's better than HER.
2006-09-16 13:44:36 · answer #9 · answered by THE LONER 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good idea. It would show that the world doesn't hate America, just Bush.
2006-09-16 13:37:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think he'd be a great UN SG. The Republican hatred of the UN would be amplified all the more though.
2006-09-16 13:39:23 · answer #11 · answered by Akkakk the befuddled 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋