Democrats and Terrorists?

Question

Are the Democrats going to give the Terrorists amnesty? I mean god forbid we listen to their INTERNATIONAL phone calls to see what they are plotting. God fordbid we trace their money, everything takes money. God forbid we press them for information by blasting music to them.

Also dems cry about Club Gitmo. Average weight gain 7-8 pounds. Look at the weather of Gitmo compared to Iraq or Afghan. Free prayer rug, Koran or other holy book to worship the god of their choice all for free!!!

How will Democrats further support the Terrorists rights and well being?

Answer 1

Why not? They're already giving them encouragement and fighting tooth and nail to give the ones that get caught a free legal defense along with all the rights accorded an American citizen who is arrested.

What the hell ails these nut bags? The Islamic terrorist would return the favor by murdering their families and cutting their heads off.

Wouldn't you think that in order to deserve human rights that you first have to act human?

Answer 2

The democrats think we need court orders to spy on our enemies during war. The Constitution protects American citizens not foreign terrorists. I can't even imagine what would have happened if during World War 2 we decided we need court orders to spy on the Nazi's. The democrats always seem to be more concerned with protecting terrorists than protecting Americans. They find problems everywhere with how terrorism is being fought but never come up with ideas of their own. They hate Bush so much that their hatred blinds them. George W. Bush is not the enemy, the terrorists are the enemy. I hope that they can get over politics and realize that the real struggle is between freedom and tyranny not between Republicans and Democrats.

Answer 3

LOL, as regardless of the reality that a terrorist sympathizer might want to recognize something about what does and does not tear this u . s . a . aside. Dude, democrats and liberals are and function been terrorist sympathizers and supporters for the perfect six years. it really is a reality. the added undeniable reality that they don't understand it really is something that we've been attempting, with not a lot fulfillment, for instance to you. even even as the terrorists themselves propose democratic applicants, it makes no effect on you. even even as terrorist the international over were taking heart and were inspired by employing your efforts to provide as a lot as their will, it meant not something to you. Terrorism the international over is as undesirable because it really is as a right away effect of the help, encouragement and convenience offered to them by employing liberal lack of understanding in this u . s . a .. i'm sorry. yet even as democrats and liberals initiate exhibiting situation and giving suggestion on what tears this u . s . a . aside, my look after is going up on the grounds that I easily have considered that uniting this u . s . a . is completely the very last difficulty a liberal is in touch with. Dude, liberals are as a lot the enemy as those we are combating in yet another u . s . a ., in basic terms they are diverse. not like the overt acts of violence perpetrated by employing the terrorists, liberals artwork from interior and spoil u . s . 'covertly'. for this reason u . s . has consistently respected their enemies in uniform and hung spys. One is truthful and, in a fashion, honorable. the different isn't.

Answer 4

We have been fighting wars, even a civil war, without turning our back on the document that defines us, the US constitution. No one is saying that we shouldn't monitor phone calls or money transfers. We're just saying it should be done within the law. If law enforcement and the intelligence community is running into obstacles or limitations because of existing law then petition congress to change the law. That's the way it's supposed to work.

Answer 5

In WW2, illegal combatants were executed, not treated like american citizens. We need to do what we've been doing, squeeze them for info using physical pressure (not torture) and then decide whether to blow their heads off or send them back to their home countries when and if the conflicts are concluded.

But liberals are hell-bent on criticizing every effort ont he part of the Bush administration to wage war on terror and keep this country safe. The democratic party is surely the Al-Queda party and media outlets like the Al-Jazeera and the NY times are happy to help anytime they can.

Answer 6

I'm not a democrat but I must come to their defense here. They never said that we shouldn't listen to their phone calls or trace their money or anything else that would allow us to catch and prosecute them. I think the point is that the law says a court order is needed before you can do these things and nobody is above the law; not even this administration.

Answer 7

How will Republicans further destroy the lives of thousands of innocent people in order to stop and kill roughly 5% of the popluation they're searching for. The argument is that it is not worth ruining the lives of innocent people without taking into consideration what you are doing. If we knew that a terrorist was living roughly in the vicinity of the city of Oklahoma, would it be okay to bomb the town, and place the entire population under the stress of losing resources and healthy water and killing people in order to find that one individual? I think you would have to argue that it is not worth the cost. It's not a matter of giving the terrorists pardons and making their lives greater, it's a question of ensuring that the majority of people do not get wrongly injured, harmed, or killed.

Answer 8

Under the Clinton administration, democrats gave North Korea 10 billion dollars for them to end their nuclear weapons program (and we saw the result recently). So there is really no telling what support other terrorists will be getting.

Answer 9

is this all you have... all you say is that we're supporting terrorists because we want goverment oversight?

It's too much to ask the conservatives to play by the laws set down years ago apparently... they are FAR TOO INCOMPETENT to play by the rules and keep us safe... they clearly have to bend the rules to even come close to having a secure U.S....

the rules are there for a reason, and history shows again and again why those rules are there... yet conservatives face a terrorists threat from men in caves and they throw every rule in the book out in fear... all the while, they never really ACTUALLY ATTACK THE THREAT FULL ON...

Answer 10

well you see that is the point , the republicans have been unable to even get the evidence to support a single one is a terrorist. republicans must keep them where they are or they will admit they are wrong like they were about Iraq and after new orleans how many debacles will the american public put up with?