Terrible officiating.
2006-09-16 12:28:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Human nature? No way, it was too over the top. These guys get PAID to be good at officiating.
The equivalent on the other side of the game fence would have been if Peterson made a great run, stopped 2 yards off from the end zone, walked over to the nearest Duck defender, tapped him on the shoulder and then handed the ball to him.
It was that bad.
2006-09-16 12:50:27 · answer #1 · answered by Chris C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oregon does deserve the victory.... They paid the refs therefore they got the win... Don't you know anything about Pac 10 football?
2006-09-17 16:28:48 · answer #2 · answered by The Man 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oregon won? Man! That stinks. Well if iot was the refs tehn that's the only way they could win!
2006-09-16 12:30:24 · answer #3 · answered by JENNLUPE 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Two bad calls, but the on-side was the obviously HORRIBLE one. How much money is he making from off shore bookies?
2006-09-16 12:32:42 · answer #4 · answered by Jeffrey M K 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cheater baby
2006-09-17 05:43:34 · answer #5 · answered by smitty 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The only ones they can get.
2006-09-16 12:49:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's human nature. A win is a win no matter how it happened.
2006-09-16 12:39:22 · answer #7 · answered by normy in garden city 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
STUPID CALL I AM PISSED WHY SHOULD OU GET SCREWED FOR SOMETHING THAT THE OTHER TEAM DID?
IM A BELIEVER IF YOU DO SOMETHING IN SPORTS YOU SHOULD GET CREDIT FOR IT **** ALL OF THIS CHALLENGE CRAP WHY SHOULD WE HAVE TO CHALLENGE THEY SHOULD CHECK IT OUT AND GET THEIR CALL RIGHT!!!!!!!
2006-09-16 13:26:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋