2006-09-16 11:41:56 · 7 answers · asked by S H I R A Z 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To say that something is"fairly reasonable and objective" is like saying someone is fairly pregnant.
2006-09-16 11:52:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
And you call something "Fairly reasonable and objective" when you DON'T agree with it?
My, you fly in the face of reality! I find that laughable coming from a party of Bush, Limbaugh and Coulter!
2006-09-16 18:47:06 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
pls don't mention the words "fairly reasonable and objective ", u do not have the slightest clue of their meaning
2006-09-16 19:18:54 · answer #3 · answered by me 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Once again your premise is fatally flawed.
Something can be fairly reasonable and objective as long as it is argued rationally, and considers multiple perspectives.
And again you seem unable to distingish between the concepts of "agreement" and "respect". Just becuase a person respects someone else's statement doesn't mean they argree with it.
But since both "agreement" and "respect" are foreign concepts, we'll just chalk it up to your learning curve. Someday when you're older you might understand what those terms mean.
2006-09-16 18:46:33 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
I don't. I would call any statement reasonable if I felt it was supported strongly enough to make a feasible argument. Yours just happen to consistently lack facts, maturity, and overall credibility.
2006-09-16 18:45:45 · answer #5 · answered by Holly 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I love it when andy g immediately answers shiraz with one of his comic one liners.
He must be following shiraz real close.
2006-09-16 20:15:48 · answer #6 · answered by Bad M 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
that is what the lying left considers to be free speech
2006-09-16 18:43:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 8⤋