Why does Flubya think that Catching ObL isn't important? Is not bin Laden the inspiration of thousands...?

Question

of scary terrorists, much as Jesus is the inspiration of millions of scary Christians? Also, if catching ObL isn't (and obviously never was) important, then what's the rationale behind going after Saddam Hussein?

I get so tired of pointing this out, but feel that I must: the Bushvotes either demean a serious question that they are incapable of logically answering (naturally, because the whole Bushworld they inhabit is illogical) or, they bring up Bill Clinton. Huh? Clinton didn't announce to the nation that he'd get him "dead or alive" - which is, of course, probably the biggest blow one could strike against the terrorists. DUH!!!!!

Isn't it positively hilarious, in spite of being so damned predictable, that the numbskulls who call themselves things like 'beer' this or 'lord' that can't come up with anything resembling a logical answer? They never fail to amuse. I wonder if any of the brainwashed Bushies would care to edit their postings and INCLUDE AN ANSWER?????
Oops. I'm asking idiots to use brains they don't have, aren't I? My bad!

Answer 1

There's no money if there's no war my sweetness. He's rolling in it Mrs C through his fathers business contacts.
Evil man.

Answer 2

It depends on which lie you believe!! He sure didn't go after bin Laden. who's family is a friend of the Bush's!!

"We will stand up for terror. We will stand up for freedom."
—Bush, speaking on the campaign trail, Oct. 18, 2004, in Marlton, N.J.

"Gosh, I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those exaggerations."
—Bush, during the final presidential debate, attempting to refute Kerry’s claim that the president boasted he was not concerned about Osama bin Laden.

"So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him... We haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."
—Bush, answering a question about Osama bin Laden at a March 13, 2002 news conference.

"After standing on the stage, after the debates, I made it very plain, we will not have an all-volunteer army. And yet, this week— we will have an all-volunteer army. Let me restate that."
—Bush, showing signs of confusion (yet again) at an Oct. 16, 2004, campaign stop in Daytona Beach.

"The truth of that matter is, if you listen carefully, Saddam would still be in power if he were president of the United States, and we’d be a lot better off."
—Bush at the second presidential debate in St. Louis, Oct. 8, 2004.

Answer 3

Other than being very insulting you have no worth, or intelligence for that matter. And it's a very good thing that the "scary Christians" aren't anything like the "scary terrorist" or your head yield soon be forfeit. He didn't say that catching him wasn't important, just not the prime focus. Why don't you pay attention to what is going on instead of going off on a pointless rant, asking questions that have been answered thousands of times....Just how dense are you?

Answer 4

this is an ethical and in basic terms victory. it would want to both advance American morale and decrease Al-Qaeda's morale. even regardless of the reality that the 17 November isn't as regimented and the capture of bin encumbered would not be a large logistic victory, he continues to be their figurehead and may want to be considered as a significant defeat for Al-Qaeda. His persevered survival, contained in the face of all that we've already thrown at him, facilitates him to be a banner that terrorists and wanna-bes can flock round. It shows that someone can face up to u . s . with relative impunity. (emphasis on relative) i do not trust we'd want to consistently commit each and every thing we've contained in the container in basic terms to his capture, yet we'd want to consistently under no circumstances have lengthy previous into Iraq and left Afghanistan the way we did. Iraq develop right into a significant distraction from the "warfare on Terror" and has in basic terms created extra complications, not solved any. because we left for Iraq, bin encumbered develop into in a position to flee, the Taliban develop into allowed to bypass into hiding and is now in a position to effect a resurgence now, and Afghanistan is now again in turmoil (now to not educate the flaws that exceeded off to Iraq). regrettably it would want to be too previous due too pull out now...

Answer 5

Now he is saying that it is important to catch Bin Laden-- but of course our president never flip flops.

Here's a quote from Friday's press conference in the Rose Garden.

"And there is a kind of an urban myth here in Washington about how this administration hasn't stayed focused on Osama bin Laden. Forget it. It's convenient throw-away lines when people say that. We have been on the hunt, and we'll stay on the hunt until we bring him to justice, and we're doing it in a smart fashion"

Answer 6

Hey, not to worry. His capture will be announced just a few days - no more than a week - before the November elections. President Rove has it all worked out so that Republicans can get elected in November.

Answer 7

Bush has a short attention span, he needed a new fight to keep interested. You are wrong in equating Bin Laden and Jesus, they have nothing in common.

Answer 8

What are you complaining about? BJ (Bill Jefferson)Clinton didn't think it was a big deal either.

Answer 9

Actually, your husband has bin Laden hidden out in one of his many secret love-nests.
Oh, you didn't know about them?
I guess Billy didn't think you woman enough to handle it.
And he didn't want to watch you grovel.

Answer 10

Come back when you have a serious question to ask, little boy.