If NASA ever decide to have a manned mission to the Moon or Mars what evidence do you ask to show that it was not being staged managed in a film studio or on some other location ? ? Because one thing is sure - next time such a propaganda feat is attempted those astronauts must (if the mission is real) overcome the radiation of the Van Allen belt and there can be no dodgy pictures with secondary light sources suggesting a fake. This time we need to see exactly how astronaut air conditioning works on the lunar surface in their craft and in their suits (a place where temperatures are several hundred degrees for many hours each day). So what real test would show the genuineness of such a mission ?
2006-09-16 10:56:13 · 17 answers · asked by democracynow 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
a webcam on the front of the astronauts head beaming out live pictures over the internet, plus a colour video camera this time, not some low quality grainy footage but tv quality picture so we can really see the detail on the earth etc.
and yes i don't believe anyone ever landed on the moon.
2006-09-16 11:00:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 9⤋
The original mission in 1969 was independently verified by both the Australia radio telescope and the Soviet government. The Soviets, particularly, had every reason to see the landing as a fake but didn't.
Personally, I think all the questions about the original mission have been answered. It happened.
(I'm attaching a link that attempts to tackle all the so called 'questionable' aspects of the moon landings often quoted by the conspiracy theorists.)
2006-09-16 11:08:55 · answer #2 · answered by Matt 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A photocopied certificate of Authenticity...
(Note - the technology for going to the moon was there back in the late 60's, and the Van Allen belt isnt much of an issue, if you pass through it quickly. The main problem with the moon photos is Standard Film cannot survive the rapid temperature changes from -170celcius to 150celcius and retain good quality pictures, if any)
2006-09-16 11:06:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe they did go on a manned mission before.
I think a simple scientific test (if they bring back more rock samples) could easily show if it was true of false. Seeing as to it they don't find a place were rock samples haven't been collected here on earth. If so and they do go back to the moon ( assuming they already have) they should go to the "dark side" of the moon.
2006-09-16 11:24:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is so nice to see one of the other silly internet frauds showing up. I am so tired of seeing only the 911 conspirisies showing up.
Yes we were on the moon, we left reflextive device there and there are signals bounced back and forth still today to measure the movement of the moon.
And no level of proof would be acceptable ( they could take people like you with them) and you would still swear it was not real.
2006-09-16 11:08:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you attempt to ask a 'significant' question about the moon landing again, what evidence could prove it's genuineness?
If you ever decide to ask another question about our manned spaceflight capacity what evidence shall we require that you are not just trolling for fun?
2006-09-16 13:07:28 · answer #6 · answered by wm_omnibus 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing they can do to convince the hard core hoax believers. The current Moon hoax phenomenon is based entirely on easily explained misunderstandings. If you don't believe we went to the Moon, it's willful ignorance on your part. I've even heard people argue that the total lack of supporting evidence for their crackpot ideas is proof of the intensity of the coverup!
2006-09-16 11:36:06 · answer #7 · answered by injanier 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think just a nice postcard with a well intentioned message would be absolutely lovely. Not a saucy one or anything rude, just a nice view of the scenery and not one from the hotel either, a proper one from a nice shop.
Oh, you said Van Allen, I used to love his show, is he going with you ?
2006-09-16 11:36:58 · answer #8 · answered by Robert Abuse 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No matter what evidence NASA would present, the leftists anti-Americans in the world will always find a way to deny the evidence.
They will write bestsellers books and prize winning films denouncing the achievements as frauds, and they will receive the approval from half of the world morons and from absolutely all the self-called "intellectuals".
2006-09-16 11:36:19 · answer #9 · answered by NaughtyBoy 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Ah...your one of these stupid gullible people who believe anything you read.
If they didnt go Mr Stupid, please explain why the reflectors that they placed to measure the distance from the earth to the moon (to the nearest mm) are used every single day by scientists across the world.
People like you defile the sacrifice and hard work of our adventurers and explorers.
If you refuse to believe what possible reason is there to do something new.
Tell you what, why dont you just sit in your chair and vegetate
2006-09-16 11:02:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
they best was i see is to hold a competetion/lottery and choose a skeptic or a conspiracy theorist and take them for the ride as an impartial observer.
or use realtime webcams all throughout the mission, so everyone can follow the progress from Earth.
2006-09-16 11:02:43 · answer #11 · answered by ynroh 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋