This does not exactly answer you question, but you have reminded of a question I have.
Overall, I give Bush’s coaches high marks for the way they have taught him to say ‘fascist’. And, have you noticed how proud Bush is of himself every time he says it? He’s like a child that, as soon as they learn a new word, they keep saying it over-and-over again, even though they do not understand the word’s meaning.
This brings me to my question. When Bush was saying ‘fascist’ with every other breath, why didn’t someone ask him to define what he meant. The term is utterly irrelevant and meaningless in terms of any of the events occupying the President’s time.
The White House marketing department has introduced it as if it were a name-brand product, like Kleenex and Toyota. Americans have an emotional definition of fascist as: 1. bad; and 2. scary, but they do not know where the term comes from or what it means – a Roveism.
It’s a brilliant way to make stupid people think they know something about something they know nothing about. Even if it has a different meaning for each person, they can still talk about it because each person assumes their understanding is the correct one. Brilliant! (as the beer guys say).
Hey there Ms. Clinton.
This is from the answer to another question, but I thought it would go well with your additional details. I’ve previously pointed out to the very same Nyuk Nyuk that the real Stooges were Jewish liberals.
Republican men hate Hillary because they know they don’t have the wood for the job and it makes them ashamed of themselves. They can hear her voice as she whispers those three little words in their ear, “Where is it”? and “maybe you should tie a string to it”.
As a group, however, these (individual) wanks become a pack of manly-men, ready to put that b**** in her place. It’s pathetic, really – and maybe a little gay.
2006-09-16 10:43:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You think calling the president "Flubya" & saying he can't speak English is a legitimate question? As a Texan,with a thick accent myself, I find that very insulting.
You question actually makes me think of Jeff Foxworthy's joke "People hear this accent & want to automatically deduct 20 IQ points." I am from Texas & have a pretty strong southern accent, as well. But I am very intelligent as are many other Texas' I know. My father was a missionary with a thick Texas accent. He used to joke that he spoke Spanish better than English. But he was a brilliant man!
My point is - listen to WHAT a people say, not HOW they say it. Then we can have an honest debate.
* And while I agree that Monica Lewinsky has nothing to do with this question, only one person resorted to the low level of bringing her up. And that was only one notch lower than the level you already sunk to in "asking" that "question."
2006-09-16 15:30:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Smart Kat 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
exciting challenge you describe right here... one that doesn't exist for community audio equipment of alternative languages that use this (Latin) or Cyrillic alphabet, as they're all used to connect the letters easily. My community language is German. German orthography is very diverse to that for the period of English and English has some sounds that don't exist in German. Germans who learn English as adults usually have a challenge to pronounce those sounds, like the TH, and the English R and L that are stated in yet in a various way. i began out to benefit English on the age of 9 and not in any respect got here across it confusing to pronounce. i think of that's usually confusing to benefit a language that's amazingly plenty diverse on your community language. i think of for audio equipment of eu languages, chinese language may be an exceedingly confusing language. i've got not tried to benefit it, yet i've got heard that for the period of chinese language the tone pitch has a skill on what a notice ability, and as that's something that doesn't exist in eu languages, it would be very confusing to get used to that.
2016-10-15 01:49:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its actually like a scary movie, do you know that people actually voted for him. A coke snorting, alcoholic with no morals. Let alone he can't put as many of three words together and make a sentence. They not only voted for him but they voted for him twice and the really bad ones are the ones that still support him. Nascar, Papst Blue Ribbon and George Bush are their hero's
2006-09-16 10:13:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Totally impossible - if he hasn't done it by the age of 60, he never will. Remember, he's a functional illiterate so something like the mastery of the language is a pretty tall order.
2006-09-16 10:14:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush isn't the only American president to lose the "nucular" war. In his "On Language" column in the New York Times Magazine in May 2001, William Safire lamented that, besides Bush, at least three other presidents—Eisenhower, Carter, and Clinton—have mangled the word.
http://www.slate.com/id/2071155
2006-09-16 10:11:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Dumbya and the other hicks think the language they're speaking is actually called American.
So, first, they'd have to realize that they're actually speaking the language English to begin to be able speak it well.
2006-09-16 10:13:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by p2prox 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
He still has Tony Blair to "Splain" the difficult things.
But I'm worried what will happen if Blair retires. Will Bushler be speechless?
Go big Red Go
2006-09-16 10:10:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by 43 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
I doubt he will ever master the English language. What scares me is how many people are now saying nu-Q-ler.
2006-09-16 10:08:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by sassy_lassy70 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Any predictions on when you will grow up? Or is growing up, as I suspect, an impossibility with you?
2006-09-16 10:30:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋