should the conservatives who were in power during Clintons second term have left him alone the getting his dick sucked in office and let him do his ******* job so they wouldnt be crying and blaming him like a bunch of little bitches right now? Should they maybe have not kept him worried all the time about the tiniest bit of garbage they would dig up and let him do his job? Do you think they feel guilty?
2006-09-16 09:22:11 · 12 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It doesnt. Im sick of Clinton being blamed
2006-09-16 09:28:50 · update #1
The fact that the Democrats didn't make your response shows that they are really agents of the right wing--politics is just a food fight at a prep school. Also, the fact that I only heard once the rebuttal that the brilliant victory in the initial invasion of Iraq was achieved by Clinton's Army.
When Clinton was President, the chickenhawk Republican hypocrites never criticized him for being soft on the terrorists. As you state, if he had gone after these vicious slime (the terrorists, not the Republicans) more aggressively, the GOPinionators and talk-show nannies would have flamed him for showboating and wagging the dog. Second, did Dubai Dubya do anything to correct the mistakes of Clinton's policy? On the contrary, the ignorant Preppy Pipsqueak cancelled all anti-terrorist activism and concentrated on re-starting the Cold War with Russia, resenting the fact that President Reagan, who beat out Dumbo Dubya's daddy for the nomination, had put the Soviet Union away for good as long as some annoying rich punk didn't come along and make the Russian Bear see Red again.
2006-09-16 09:38:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, hindsights 20/20 but a president who loathed the military put himself in the awkward position of not really being able to use it.
Maybe he should have let the Serb's finish off the Moslems in Kosovo. Captured or killed Osama one of the times he had a chance to do that. Or finished the job in Somalia, instead of cutting and running.
Maybe his fooling around interfered with getting his job done. There's a story that Osama was in the cross hairs, and the military people needed his OK to pull the trigger but he was indisposed on one of his covert oval orifice missions and they were unable to get his approval to launch the strike in time.
Who knows, we can speculate from now until 30 American cities go up in a nuclear bon fire or we can deal with the situation we have now.
2006-09-16 16:32:55 · answer #2 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
II think you don't know what you are talking about!
Who sold weapons to the enemy?
Who ran after 242 Marines were killed in Beirut?
It is funny it is the same conservatives that did not support Clinton who really did degrade any weapons Iraq had in Operation Desert Fox! Clinton didn't get one person killed, but the Repubs were claiming just the opposite than they are now!
2006-09-16 16:29:34 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If Lewinski were hot, the whole thing would not have been an issue. I blame Clinton for having bad taste ... that's all. Otherwise he was a funny prez.
2006-09-16 16:45:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
he was worried all the time. The man had more lawsuits against him than should be allowed. He's damn lucky he made through the Presidency alive. Why do you think we can no longer drive in front of the white house. yes they wanted that no good ba$tard gone. His shenanigans and his ego paralyzed his administration. Clinton has only himself to blame.
2006-09-16 16:26:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You mean the same Clinton that had the chance to apprehend Bin Laden from the Sudanese Govt, but refused???
You mean the same Clinton, that had the chance to bomb Bin Ladens safe house when he was in it, but refused because there were other people in it and he was afraid of being accused of "wagging the dog" during his BJ scandal???
The same Clinton, that finally decides on an action yet tips off Pakistan, which then tipped off Bin Laden that the U.S. was about to send tomahawk missiles into a sudan factory that Bin laden was in??
The same Clinton that had he acted instead of distracted could have taken bin Laden into custody, prosecuted him for murderous attacks on Americans in Somalia and spared the lives of thousands who were killed or wounded in future attacks, like the twin towers?????
The Same Clinton that Sudan had talked to regarding the fact that they knew his whereabouts and had the ability to bring a large force to bear in a surprise attack on bin Laden. In fact, a Sudanese representative told the wall street journal that bin Laden could have been captured as his truck moved through the streets of Khartoum.
In addition, Sudan offered to turn over all of its files on bin Laden--the result of more than four years of day-to-day surveillance. A Sudanese government representative indicated that these files filled several rooms and included the history of numerous financial transactions, which could be used to expose the global spider web known as al Qaeda.
Yeah that Clinton, he sure can clean up a mess.
NEXT!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-16 16:32:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
That office you speak of belongs to the PEOPLE of the United States of America, not any president!
2006-09-16 21:50:50 · answer #7 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clinton should not have put himself in such a position. Politics are dirty, you have to keep your nose clean. That is why many questioned his judgment more than anything else.
2006-09-16 16:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Clinton never worried about our country, only about himself.
I feel guilty I couldn't convince enough Americans not to vote for the self centered sob.
2006-09-16 16:26:16 · answer #9 · answered by jim g 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
What in the hell does this have to do with radical Islam?
2006-09-16 16:27:56 · answer #10 · answered by Lone solider 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋