English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Seriously what does he have to do before you are like ok thats it, you so crossed the line with that. Would you be okay with a camera shoved up your *** in the interest of keeping you safe? Would you be okay with all your phone calls being monitored to keep you safe? Where do you draw the line?

2006-09-16 08:24:29 · 14 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 in Politics & Government Politics

How much proof do you need??
The evidence for war was a lie?
God did you all suck at playing connect the dots as a kid? Seriously how ******* stupid can you be to not get this.Its so simple.The war was illegal.Saddam was not a threat.NOT A THREAT.

2006-09-16 08:30:14 · update #1

14 answers

. Liberal stems from the word Liberty so what is non American about being Liberal.. You have nothing to hide in your phone conversations ?? Get serious you have never held your hand over the mouthpiece to keep someone from hearing???

How do you know who's phones are being tapped??? Because Bush tells you?? How do you know he isn't selling your info to make money ? Cause he says so ??? What if a terrorist dials a wrong number that puts you on the watch list for ever.

Just because you are not discussing with terrorists surly doesn't mean you have nothing to hide,or may discuss something on the phone that isn't the governments god dammed business .. The states are becoming what the USSR use to be. A police state where everyone and everything is recorded . Pretty soon there will be cameras in your bedroom and bathrooms. As long as your afraid you will be OK with all that.

I'm starting to think of Bush as a commie.trying to impose more and more restrictions to what you can and cant do and those of you who feel safer will change your tune after the next attack its only a matter on when not if.. The country is as wide open as ever.. The only difference is the US citizens can't live as before..

2006-09-16 08:56:05 · answer #1 · answered by Shawn S 3 · 1 2

Hmmm. The war with Iraq was unjustified because of no wmds? Well, if you will take the time to look back, you will see that old GW was not the only one fooled by this. Over half of the civilized nations and most of our senate and house of Representatives were also fooled. Guess they all will have to be accused of lying since congress approved the Iraqi war. If it will keep one American safe, I don't care how many of my telephone calls are bugged. I do not want ANYTHING shoved up my*** and that includes your left-wing terrorist supporting BS.

2006-09-16 09:02:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

And Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman. And Clinton didn't inhale. They all lie. But I'd rather have a president who will do something besides bang an intern while Bin Laden spits in our faces. Tap my phones. I have nothing to hide. I draw the line at indifference.

2006-09-16 08:30:22 · answer #3 · answered by Emm 6 · 3 1

sorry but phone tapping laws come from laws passed in 1994 and 2000. ummmm small quaintly of wmds have been found in Iraq, the rest moved to Syria, look up General Sada and read his story . the same people that said Iraq did not have wmds are now saying Iran is not up grading uranium for bombs. which is funny because Iran has said the are doing that and it is no body's business. and talking about killing people is as illegal on the phone as inside your house.

2006-09-16 09:18:48 · answer #4 · answered by rap1361 6 · 1 1

The proof is indisputable, the evidence is everywhere if you just look. Google bush and lies. It's all there. One example on video where Bush says they get warrants for wiretaps and later says he doesn't have to - after the NYTIMES forced him to come clean;

Let ME listen in to your conversations, let ME put a camera in your office. Let ME listen to you talk to your attorney. You have nothing to hide right?

2006-09-16 08:47:50 · answer #5 · answered by notme 5 · 0 1

genuine, he spoke against hypocrisy which plagues the two events. Born right this moment, he might have been categorized a "Lib-retard". All that merchandising what you should provide to the unfavorable and peace loving communicate. And paying taxes to Cesar! No "Neocon" might have his ideology.

2016-10-15 01:47:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NOT A THREAT? How about the rape and torture rooms, the genocide, the Al Queda bases? WAKE UP before it is too late!

2006-09-16 14:54:04 · answer #7 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1 1

Never

They lack the cognitive ability.


Go big Red Go

2006-09-16 08:43:48 · answer #8 · answered by 43 5 · 1 1

My phone calls would never be tapped because I don't receive or make calls to Terrorists. The same with all of the other areas of my life.

2006-09-16 08:27:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

This comming from the idiots that supported and still support Bill Clinton. Get a clue you moron

2006-09-16 08:27:45 · answer #10 · answered by USMCstingray 7 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers