2006-09-16 07:32:03 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well this is kind of a trick question because the international community is suppose to be all nations... when a person refers to the international community, they are usually referring to the international consensus.
Now with that said, the USA has such an enormouc imperalistic hand on so many of those smaller nations added to the fact that the USA is 1 of the 5 permanent UN members with veto power, one might argue that there is no such thing as an international community. But rather, the USA's speaks for the world.
2006-09-16 07:34:44 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The United Nations is an International Organization. The International Community is the world, regardless of membership in the United Nations.
2006-09-16 07:34:30 · answer #2 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The phrase "international community" refers to countries informally working together.
The "United Nations" is a specific organization, with a specific structure and specific rules. While it may have originally been intended to represent the international community as a whole, it has stopped serving that purpose because of its bloated bureaucracy.
2006-09-16 07:34:45 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it can be summed up in 1 sentence:
The international community would be much better off without the United Nations Organization (it is incompetent, corrupt).
2006-09-16 07:42:22 · answer #4 · answered by marceldev29 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For domestic consumption the west always portrays them self as good guys and address them selves as international community.Major members USA,great Britain,France Germany,Australia Canada and Newzealand.Japan does not count.
2006-09-16 07:46:52 · answer #5 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋