Dubya could TORTURE all the people he wants if he was a Islamo Inforcer.
2006-09-16 05:04:06 · 25 answers · asked by 43 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's like the difference between terrorism and freedom fighting. It's only torture when the other guy does it.
2006-09-16 05:07:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
The word you wrote that I have cause to question is "should." This word "should" suggests that there is a moral standard that people have to live up to or within, and you know as well as I do that the Republicans would generally disagree. There is no should in the Bush's world. There is no should in the Republican world other than what well keep them in power.
But now six years into Bush's leadership (loosely used description) four Republicans have stood up and said no to Bush over torture, and thank god we have finally run into a "should" that can restrain Bush. And we all saw the result, Bush acted as if he were about to be caught doing something he should not do. Should this be the case, that he has been doing some unconstitutional things around torture, well he SHOULD, be absolutely restrained and brought to justice.
2006-09-16 05:30:45 · answer #2 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
didnt you ask the same dumb question yesterday??
well here's the same answer.
You cant compare what a few bad apples have done in Iraq to the kind of disgusting murder of innocent civilians that Islamofacists do every day.
If we followed the ways of the muslim scum terrorists we would behead all those we capture after we get done torturing them.
But instead we give them 3 healthy squares a day, a cot, medical, dental and clean linens (not to mention a quran).
I wonder how many of our guys get a Bible before the scum behead them....
Sorry, but those who protest against how we treat the enemy combatants when captured should be Shouting at the top of their lungs in protest about how OUR guys are treated when captured....their silence endorses the terrorists which makes them unfit to live in this country or enjoy the rights of an American citizen...they are scum and should be eliminated if they dont protest against the treatment (beheadings) of our "Guys".
The Constitution of the United States makes it the primary function of government to protect and provide for Life,Liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These are written a very specific descending order. With out protecting life first - Liberty and happiness have little value. By locking up the scum of the earth that have sworn to die in the jihad to make islam a worldwide cult and destroy everything America stands for and protecting my life from them even unfortunately yours 43.
2006-09-16 05:06:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
When the Saudis "questioned" a suspected terrorist, he gave up all the names involved in an Islamic terror cell located in London and they were subsequently arrested - just prior to implementing their plan to blow up two commercial jets over the Atlantic Ocean.
Do you think if the United States had detained this dirt bag, we would have gotten the information that eventually saved all of those innocent lives?
Let's realistically weigh the rights of one terrorist against the lives of hundreds of innocent men, women and children.
mmmmm......maybe there's another side to your question - maybe, just maybe, rather than your false premise that GWBush "loves torture so much" - perhaps he just wants to try and do everything he possibly can to prevent more murder and maiming of innocent people?
Before you easily dismiss that point, consider that your family might have been scheduled to be on one of those flights.....
2006-09-16 05:20:34 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Did you ask the same bulls** question two days ago.
I have one for you, If you don't like torture or harsh interrogation on radical, Islamic, Fascist, maniacal, satanic, bloodthirsty, crazy zealot, killers, to save thousands of lives then should you convert to Islam?
update:
bia bia, do you have proof of this, obviously, you are a delusional terrorist appeaser, you government, educated moron.
2006-09-16 05:11:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wow!
It's only 12pm here and you've already won the "Most Stupidest Question Award!"
I'm not a Bush fan, but in one sentence you've actually insulted an entire political party, the English speaking community (with your spelling), and many Muslims. Not only that, the African American race simply for being Black!
2006-09-16 05:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by The Mac 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Every society throughout history has used torture as a means of getting answers. Religion has nothing to do with it.
2006-09-16 05:08:57 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. He should become an inmate of Guantamo for a few months so that he can experience exactly what he is promoting
2006-09-18 01:23:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be rediculous. He doesn't LOVE torture. He believes that we need to use whatever interrogation techniques it takes to get information out of terrorists who want to kill you and me. I don't have a problem with that at all. In fact, as long as the Democrats keep appeasing the terrorists and undermining the war on terror, I'm going to keep voting for Republicans.
2006-09-16 05:07:25 · answer #9 · answered by Eric H 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Most of our problems with the Muslim world stem from our own greed. In 1953 Iran wanted to nationalize the oil industry but the Brits had a company there called the Anglo Iranian oil co. that had interests in the oil. They were offered money for their interests but turned it down. Truman did not interfere but when Eisenhower got in they were able to convince him that Iran was in danger of allying with the Russians so with the aid of British and American intelligence they brought the shah to full power. The shah eventually became a brutal dictator but the people revolted and replaced him. This also led to the invasion by students of our embassy there. My point in telling you this is that in many ways we are responsible for the hate against us.
Reagan did nothing to try to sooth relations and in fact encouraged Saddam Hussein in his war with Iran. So you can blame who you wish, but to me it seems we got ourselves into this quandary and the best course of action would be to admit past mistakes and try for better relations. I really don't buy the fact that most Muslim nations really don't want peace with us. They know they would be annihilated if they were to seriously damage this country say with a nuclear or biological attack.
1 second ago
2006-09-16 05:05:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋