basic human rights? does this child have any?

Question

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/09/15/1157827159564.html is this 2006 or the stone age

Answer 1

It's pretty sick yeah, eating a child because he might be a witch? Kick some but, set a fire, do whatever is needed but save that child from such a...I don't think there's a word for something like this. Eat someone that wants to be eaten whatever, eat yourself I don't care but what could that child have possibly done to risk being eaten?

Answer 2

In some places this is 2006 and the Stone Age.

Answer 3

I read it quickly but sounds that it will cost people a lot of money to care for this child. Most countries are poor yet parents continue to have children they cannot afford.

Many parts of the world are still living in the stone age.

Answer 4

nicely convinced, with certain worry-free sense limits. no man or woman should be compelled to be bared armed in iciness, even in southern California. Make it regulation to apply sunlight exhibit screen. someone with very bushy hands should be required to have hair eliminating. Any male donning sleeveless shirts ought to no longer disclose their arm pits. Any lady donning sleeveless tops should be careful now to not disclose more beneficial than arm.

Answer 5

A child only has the rights a parent allows as long as they are not abusing them.

Answer 6

Yes!

Answer 7

Apparently the cannibals don't think so. I guess they think they have a basic human right to eat him.

Answer 8

hu

Answer 9

No