2006-09-16 04:30:30 · 6 answers · asked by Repub-lick'n 4 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7BC05A00A0-5F99-4DB2-B282-82569327D047%7D
2006-09-16 05:09:06 · update #1
(for devincaliri.com)
2006-09-16 05:10:10 · update #2
Bush Is A Spoiled Politician. If He Had To Go Thru Torture, An Invasion Of Privacy, Or Get Shot At In The Frontlines In Todays War....He Probably Wouldn't Pass Half The Stuff He's Been Signing Off Too......(that idiot.....)
2006-09-16 04:34:03 · answer #1 · answered by Can't Make A Good Avatar!!! 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush wouldn't say anything, he'd have to ask someone else if he thought it was acceptable. Then get a second opinion. Maybe a third. Then ask Tony Blair.
2006-09-16 11:32:29 · answer #2 · answered by Rich W 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Bush would torture anyone that didn't try to kill thousands of people, and I don't think what some consider torture is anything compaired to what the terrorists do to their POW's
2006-09-16 11:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by You may be right 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Did Bush say torture was acceptable? Give me a specific location where he says torture is good.
2006-09-16 11:56:05 · answer #4 · answered by Delta Charlie 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Most likely not more then likely cry like a baby
2006-09-16 11:34:16 · answer #5 · answered by I'm crazy 4 God 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck no! He'd being changing his mind really fast.
2006-09-16 11:32:19 · answer #6 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋