Kerry-Edwards for prez again, or stars of Broke Back Mountain part 2?

Question

http://www.thatsweird.net/picture26.shtml

Answer 1

Hmmmm--not a whole lot of difference one way or the other. I suppose it would depend on what type of girlie man one would prefer--the yuppie type, or the earthy/cowby type.

I think I would pass on both and write in my dog's name. He's more masculine, has more courage and better judgment.

Answer 2

Is this where I should be posting the picture of Bush holding hands with the Saudi king? Give me a break. These guys worked together for over a year on an aggressive political campaign which pretty much consumed their personal lives. Are you saying that some normal male bonding is not going to take place? Do you have photos of them kissing intimately or having some type of gay relationship? Are you a reclusive hermit?

Answer 3

I'd say neither and WOW someone has a lot of time on their hands. check out that first picture, look at the light falling on Kerry's Shoudler and Edward's Lapel, note the absense of a shadow for Kerry's hand. Someone bothered to photoshop a gay shot of Kerry and Edwards when they have a bunch of pretty gay press shots. Doesn't propaganda like that make you feel taudry?

Answer 4

First off, its sad that in America people of the same sex cannot touch each other in even a friendly way without it being considered something sexual.

Our society suffers for it, since all humans require touch, we're tactile creatures. We're the most isolated culture in all the world. Even the Brits are more comfortable with human touch.

Second, i must admit that in my smoldering disdain for all things Kerry-Edwards, I find this highly amusing.

Answer 5

Broke back mountaineer's.

Answer 6

ha ha ha,dang good one

Answer 7

You would know !