More troops have died in Iraq than people in 9/11... is Bush a murderer?

Question

for sending there for WMDs that didnt exist?

Answer 1

Yes, Bush is a murderer-for-profit.

I can't believe that there are people that still believe that WMD's were found, and are still mentally able to do things like sit in a chair an type!

There has never, ever, ever been any evidence at all that in the time leading up to the war, that there were any WMD in Iraq. Bush admitted it, the inspectors were saying it all along, Cheney admitted it, even Condi admitted it!

There was also no evidence at all that there was any link between Saddam and 9/11! The only thing that has ever been pointed to was that after we attacked afphanistan, Zarquawi fled and was hiding in Iraq. If Saddam had known about it, he would have had him arrested and killed because SH and Zarquawi had always been enemies!

And then there's the whole "freedom" thing! Thoser people are less free now than they ever were under Saddam! Women were free to get an education. They didn't have to wear veils. They were under a secular law. Saddam was a harsh dictator, but at least he provided for his country. The government that we installed (we also installed SH in the first place) is an Islamic Fascist Republic under Sharia Law, with no rights or freedoms for women! There is no electricity in most of the country. Those few that do have it, only get it a few hours per day. There is no safe drinking water. There is no money for anyone. There is an extreme shortage of food. There is virtually no medicine or medical supplies. There are hundreds of thousands dead (percentage-wise, it would be the same as America having 10,000,000 dead!).

All for the publicly stated (by Cheney and Rumsfeld back in 2000) goal of using Iraq as a staging ground for world domination militarily, and for oil!

That would pretty much describe the entire Bush administration as serial mass murderers-for-profit.

Answer 2

In my opinion Our current President is indeed a Murderer of innocent people.Not only of United States citizens, but Iraqi citizens as well.
The man told a bald face lie, to send MY army to war against a nation that had really done nothing to me or to my country to warrant such an invasion.
The Taliban, and the government of Afghanistan that they represented, did warrant our invasion, because they hid and protected the criminal Osama Bin Laden.
However there was no proof then, nor is there proof now, that Saddam Hussein and the people of Iraq supported the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
As a matter of fact, there is ample proof that Al Qada, and all of the rest of those fanatical religious Muslim groups, hated Saddam, because he had no problem whatsoever putting Allah, and the worship of God in general, well down on his list of priorities.
Now don't get me wrong Hamas liked his money, and Saddam kept the fanatics out of his yard by giving the money to the radical Palestinians. But all that was, was a way to keep them off of his back.Saddam could have cared less about Allah, or the people who worship him, except for how they could benefit him.
Kinda like George Junior does Jesus Christ and his followers.
George and Saddam both, like to thump loud and long on their respective books of wisdom, but only when it suits their selfish intentions. Other than that, they can barely remember what the books are truly about. The love of God, and the love of ones neighbor, and the love of oneself in that order.
George Bush Jr. and his cabinet, for reasons that may never be truly understood except by them, told lies to take my sons and my daughters to war, for what I do not know. So I can only believe those reasons to be selfish and self-serving reasons. That is why in my opinion, they should all be impeached, because that is probably going to be what it takes to find out why they lied in the first place.

Answer 3

Who is right and who is wrong is not an easy answer. Your question is rather an expression of dissatisfaction. I do not think Mr. Bush is achieving his goal of fighting terrorism as well as I do not see any better idea to fight terrorism too.

I hope both parties should think about the innocent lives and emotional and physical wound of innocent civilians and service personnel. The issue of losing innocent lives should not be politicalized to gain political gain. It is time to learn from the fact and must do something new to bring peace.

It is very obvious that the Arab World does not like to listen to the US and the relationship is getting more and more antagonistic.

I think the EU should take an important role to bring world peace.

Answer 4

was Lincoln a murderer for losing 300,000 troops during the Civil War to re-unite the country and end slavery? (Add another 300,000 if you count southern troops as well)

was FDR a murderer for losing over 400,000 troops to stem the tide of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan?

Of course I don't hold GWB anywhere near their standards and beleive the whole Iraq thing a stupid fiasco but I don't naively or self-righteously think him a murderer - just an idiot and a puppet.

Answer 5

Yes he is. All it boils down to is false intelligence over nonexistent WMD's that Saddam allegedly acquired and lies for a case to engage into an illegal war in Iraq has killed almost 2,700 of our soldiers! Plus, he has soldiers' blood in his hands! Remember the phrase, "Bush lied, thousands died!"

Answer 6

No. What do mean when more people died in Iraq than people in 9/11? In World War 2,more people died in Japan than the U.S. soldiers in Pearl Harbor.

Answer 7

Syria can actually tell you that the weapons did exists. Since thats where they all ended up. Israeli and Hezbollah intellegence backs it up. Its just that no one wants to publicize it in western media.

War is war, people die in war. Considering the duration of this war our death toll is incredibly low. Much lower than any recent war.

War is actually about using deadly force to reach a moral or political goal. That deadly force, amazingly enough, results in the death of our service men and woman. They die for this cause as volunteers, because they believe in a better life for the iraqi people. Calling their leader a murderer is the same as spitting on their dead bodies. Their deaths and suffering are not in vain, stop treating this cause like sh!t.

Answer 8

Unfortunately in war there are casualties. We're fighting terrorists that want us dead, and want the Iraqi people to be oppressed. Bush is a hero in my book. The WMD. Bush isn't the only one that made that claim.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Answer 9

yes he is , as far as I know the government is ran just by bush , there is no voting or anybody that makes any decisions besides bush , after all in 03 when the war was voted for nobody voted for it , but bush went ahead and sent the troops because he wants everyone to die

i wanted to type something equally as stupid as your question

Answer 10

Of course, Bush is not only a murderer but the worst terrorist ever!