2006-09-16 03:18:44 · 29 answers · asked by STEVE D 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Other - Entertainment
both
2006-09-16 03:20:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Healthy and Happy, money can only buy so much. But then if you were rich you could afford all the best treatment.
2006-09-16 10:21:39 · answer #2 · answered by jam 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be healthy, money cannot buy you better health.
Although you are unlikely to be able to stay completely healthy if you live in abject poverty so I guess the two are relative, but it depends on the defintion of rich.
2006-09-16 10:22:08 · answer #3 · answered by horsegal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Someone told me it is better to be happy with yourself. That way you only judge yourself and know whether you are more happy when rich.
Me personally would be healthy and rich enough to do what I want 2 when I want to.
2006-09-16 10:23:27 · answer #4 · answered by vmaddams 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it's better to be healthy. and when i say healthy, i mean both physically and mentally. look at george w. bush, wealthy, but not physically healthy. look at michael jackson, wealthy, but not mentally healthy. on the other hand there are many people who earn modest incomes but can still be happy because they have their health (as well as loved ones around them). however, if you are poor to the extent that you're malnourished, it can affect your health too.
basically, it's better to be healthy, so long as you can make ends meet.
2006-09-16 10:33:24 · answer #5 · answered by skywarp_38 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would you want to be rich and unhealthy?
its better to be healthy so you can work hard to make the money!
2006-09-16 10:33:11 · answer #6 · answered by hippieiam29 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In truth a healthy man or woman is a wealthy man or women. Material wealth is an illusion really and not important.
2006-09-16 10:23:17 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
healthy!
what a stupid question!
u could be as rich as poss but if u are not in good health money would mean nothing!
2006-09-16 10:21:36 · answer #8 · answered by princessnicola23 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well to a certain degree, if you're rich, you can afford the latest treatments for diseases and such..
BUT...without your health, you haven't got much of anything...
I'd say healthy.
2006-09-16 10:22:03 · answer #9 · answered by Amanda 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both but id rather be healthy than rich!
2006-09-16 10:20:47 · answer #10 · answered by lester barnes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Healthy of course . No doubts
2006-09-16 10:21:28 · answer #11 · answered by LOUCAS A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋