Your paranoid prattling causes me to suffer overwhelming ennui.
2006-09-16 03:02:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, Pentagon officials DID cancel their flights on September 10, and a FEMA crew arrived in New York City the same day for some "exercise", and bomb-sniffing dogs had been removed from the World Trade Center the week prior... but it's all just coincidence, according to these government fairy tale lovers.
2014-09-23 08:14:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this the latest conspiracy theory, or just a rehash of an old one. I bet some Pentagon officials cancelled their flights 2 days ago, but nothing happened yesterday. People cancel and rebook flights regularly, for many reasons, like a meeting has been cancelled, they are required to attend another meeting elsewhere that is more important
2006-09-16 03:05:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by mike-from-spain 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
don't get me started on my convoluted conspiracy theories rant!
...because they made up Bin Laden, the whole thing is made up! Let's take '1984' as an example - they created someone to hate: the enemy must have a face, so that the great unwashed can be brainwashed into hating them, thus all the problems that our great country, or 'the west', has can all be attributed to 'the enemy'.
This summer, all that stuff about no liquids in hand luggage, I don't believe that! I think it was just a fabulous way to incite anger in a massive swathe of people without killing anyone, plus, think of all the extra sold in duty free 'cos people had nothing else to carry!
blah, blah, blah, what is the point? no one believes me...
2006-09-16 03:11:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by tiny miaow 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
ASHCROFT: ...Let me indicate to you that I never ceased to use commercial aircraft for my personal travel.
ASHCROFT: My wife traveled to Germany and back in August. My wife and I traveled to Washington, D.C., on the 3rd of September before the 17th -- before the 11th attack on commercial aircraft.
I have exclusively traveled on commercial aircraft for my personal travel; continued through the year 2000, through the entirety of the threat period to the nation.
The assessment made by the security team and the Department of Justice was made early in the year. It was not related to a terrorism threat as a threat to the nation. It was related to an assessment of the security for the attorney general, given his responsibilities and the job that he undertakes. And it related to the maintenance of arms and other things by individuals who travel with the attorney general. And it was their assessment that we would be best served to use government aircraft.
These were not private chartered jet aircraft. These were aircraft of the United States government. And it was on such an aircraft that I was on my way to an event in Milwaukee on the morning of September the 11th.
http://www.nj.com/war/ledger/index.ssf?/news/ledger/stories/20040414_ashcroft.html
Of course anyone who’s going to believe Ashcroft would willingly leave others in danger to keep himself safe, probably won’t have a problem assuming he’s lying here. But the thing is, he’s not alone. Even the team behind Michael Moores Farenheit 9/11 believe the “stopped flying commercial flights” story isn't entirely true.
So even Michael Moore (not exactly a friend of Bush, or Ashcroft) accepts there's probably nothing here.. Then unless more information appears, your story really doesn't look like it's going anywhere
2006-09-16 03:02:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They didn't. Two of the Joint Chiefs flew from Denver to DC on September 10th. This is just some stupid rumor that is being spread. Just because you read something like this, or hear something like this from Michael Moore, doesn't mean it is true.
2006-09-16 02:58:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by AT 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Funny, My father works at the pentagon and he flew on the 10th.
Where do you Liberals come up with all this BS
2006-09-16 02:57:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by pdudenhefer 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
you could reason with neocons. we are in a bigger unfavourable than Bush enable on. He replaced right into a lame duck president. It sounds like he did no longer know what he replaced into doing. whats up cons Obama replaced into even on the scene till 2004. ;))
2016-12-12 09:24:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, but they didn't.
Its a new urban myth & perpetuating only helps the cause of those mad islamic b*st*rds intent on killing us all!
2006-09-16 05:30:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like tripe to me
2006-09-16 02:58:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Felidae 5
·
1⤊
0⤋