Figured at 378 feet, this tree is one tall woody. I am going to need a bigger chainsaw, I think.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060908/ap_on_sc/tallest_tree_5
2006-09-16 02:52:09 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Home & Garden ➔ Maintenance & Repairs
say it is 30 feet wide, also.
2006-09-22 06:24:47 · update #1
Some flowerchild would probably climb up that tree and stay indefinitely before anybody cuts it down. They also form a circle around the tree and handcuff or chain themselves together.
2006-09-16 04:30:23 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read about the tallest Redwood, I think you are right about the feet. It is in the Redwood National Forest in Northern CA. The trees there have diameters of over 20 feet and is probably well over a 1000 years old.
2006-09-16 03:03:06 · answer #2 · answered by Thomas S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
okayyyy take that 378 ft tree, measure the circumferance(you didnt mention the diameter or circumferance), then figure the amt of board ft you could get....BUT you never mentioned how long the 2 by 4 was?
one example: 378ft tall with a 20 ft circumferance making it into 2 by 4's 8 ft long...
roughly give or take a few, aprox 18,900
2006-09-20 12:06:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 piece, thats you, bloke head.
Ever head of conservation.
Your government will come after you with a biggest chainsaw in the world, for cutting down the world's tallest redwood
2006-09-16 03:28:14 · answer #4 · answered by davmanx 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know how many 2X4's, however you probably get at least 20 to 25 years.
2006-09-23 16:10:20 · answer #5 · answered by acowboydave 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
12 foot 24,000 10 foot 30 ,000 6 foot 48,000
2006-09-22 05:40:18 · answer #6 · answered by high1315 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. but probably a dozen beaver with sore teeth -n- a few squirrels with no nuts
2006-09-23 20:37:13 · answer #7 · answered by starshew2000xl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
umm,200
2006-09-16 03:00:19 · answer #8 · answered by Wish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot.
2006-09-16 03:29:59 · answer #9 · answered by J. D. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋