English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the leaders of a country fight it out in a to the death dewl and would america have beaten iraq that way?

2006-09-16 02:28:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

13 answers

Bush would have shown his cowardice in front of the whole world

2006-09-16 02:31:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0 0

Interesting! Bush is fairly small, and Saddam is bigger and perhaps has more experience of hand to hand combat, however Saddam is also older and in poorer health than Bush. So yes, I think the USA could have beaten Iraq if Bush and Saddam went head to head.

2006-09-16 09:44:37 · answer #2 · answered by mini metro 6 · 0 0

bush is pretty little--so he is probably quick, but that bastard Saddam probably would pull a box cutter on him. Bin Laden would need a doc. note, and extra long dialysis tubing. Isn't that what the Irish have been doing???N-vs-S...doesn't seem to work for them, although we Irish love a good fight!!

Then what if Canada got pissed?????They would whack George over the head with a beer bottle. It would be great in my state with govorners. Let Devos beat the hell out of F**king Granholm--she is a Canadian anyways.I hate her, she is a twit.

2006-09-16 09:41:21 · answer #3 · answered by Dyma 3 · 0 0

I don't know... I reckon that Saddam could be a mean son of a b.itch.... he grew up on the streets of Baghdad... he probably could hold his own.... but then again.... Mr Bush.... I bet he can be one sneaky little shite too.

Although... would be good to get that fat comatose f.cuk Sharon into a ring with the Palestinian leaders. Now I know that wouldn't be a fair fight.... per se... but bloody funny to watch!

2006-09-16 09:33:33 · answer #4 · answered by Ellie29uk 3 · 0 0

if leader would fight and decide war the saddam would had beaten bush so mercilessly that bush would not prefere to see his face in mirror and champion will be pervez musharraf who is commando.

2006-09-16 09:42:50 · answer #5 · answered by nawab allam 3 · 0 0

Saddam was actually quite a big strong man, so I think Bush would have lost in a pool of cowardly tears.

2006-09-20 06:18:36 · answer #6 · answered by Omar Z 2 · 0 0

These are not medieval times to fight duels to decide issues. Better option is to sit down and talk and settle all issues peacefully.

2006-09-16 09:36:20 · answer #7 · answered by openpsychy 6 · 0 0

what a stupid suggestion. and yes america would have beaten iraq.

2006-09-16 17:33:36 · answer #8 · answered by thebigtombs 5 · 0 0

This probably explains California's choice of governor.They intend to take over the world.

2006-09-16 09:32:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That would be too easy a way out of the situation.

2006-09-16 10:12:22 · answer #10 · answered by Bill Carc 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers