English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

taken down in a controlled explosion i watched the video of them going down and i cant make my mind up it does look suspicios but why would anyone do this also the empire states building was hit by a b-52 lost in fog and it dident fall theses are the only 3 buildings in history of their size to fall due to fire. i just dont know although the conspirisy sounds more believable than the truth

2006-09-16 02:20:04 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

24 answers

No, the planes did it.

BTW: the empire state building was hit by a B-25, weighing less than 1/3 the weight of a 757, traveling with no payload and about 80,000 gallons less fuel. The ESB is concrete and steel bulding, the WTC was glass and steel. The WTC was designed to withstand the impact of a 707, about 1/2 the weight of a 757, but again, without the fuel capacity.

They are not the only building to fall because of fire, that is a myth. There have also been accidents at lift-slab construction sites and the buildings fell the exact same way, straight down.

Go to this site, it'll set your mind at ease:
http://www.911myths.com

2006-09-16 02:34:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

there were no controlled expolsions or any explosives of any type used in the WTC.

The towers collapsed when the floor trusses sagged when they were heated by the fire. They sagged because each floor is made of tons of concrete. At some point they caused the outer steel beams to break and they fell.

Building 7 collapsed because of an oil fire that was raging in the basement and caused the steel and concrete to weaken and collapse.

The Empire State building was NOT hit by a B-52, but a B-25 Mitchell bomber. Smaller airplane. The Empire State building is constructed in a completely different manner. This building was a "cage" of steel girders and beams. In the WTC the steel beams and girders were in the building core and on the outside walls of the structure.

There is no conspiracy. With all the leaks in our government do you really think it could be kept quiet?

2006-09-16 09:27:19 · answer #2 · answered by Albannach 6 · 1 1

they just weren't constructed to survive the sort of thing that happened, no one had ever thought that an aircraft would almost cut it in half, it was so weakened from the hit and explosion, that the structure failed. Once the top floors started to fall it was inevitable that the rest would due to the massive weight of the top floors. Why would anyone use a CONTROLLED explosion when there were so many inside, they would have waited till everyone that was going to get out was clear. Once agian we have people coming up with a conspiracy theory, next we are going to have a conspiracy theory about the death of Marilyn Monroe, oh, well yes we already have that ermm lets say Abe Lincoln, it was a CIA plot.

2006-09-16 09:38:30 · answer #3 · answered by mike-from-spain 6 · 2 0

The steel skeleton structure melted causing the big hefty buildings to collapse. Call it bad design. Watch the discovery documentary on it. Not the first time architects have got it completely wrong.

I watched a program about a crowded overhead balcony held up by cables gave way under the weight, and the gantry crashed down onto a party, killing loads.

2006-09-16 09:37:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes. They were taken down by controlled explosions. There is no other known method of demolishing a building in under 11 seconds, which causes the building to fall straight down into its own footprint.
There was a dire need for the buildings to be destroyed. Silverstein, the leaseholder, had signed the lease only a few months previously, and insured himself against terrorist attacks for 3.5 billion dollars..
The buildings were old and outdated, and needed to be demolished, but there was no way to do it because of the asbestos in the buildings. They needed several million dollars spending on them to make them fully useable, and to comply with current requirements.
The government's story about jet fuel melting steel is wrong. Jet fuel burns at 500 degrees C. Steel melts at 1500 degrees c.

2006-09-18 09:34:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Who cares?

approx 3000 people lost their lives... that's all I know and that's all i want to know... I saw people jump from the building.... although i didn't see where they were falling to... maybe there was a big airbag to catch them....

So if the american people really believe that this was an act by their own goverments... then why all the racial hatred being directed toward the Middle East?

Just keep nodding your heads.... and keep jumping when your government tell you to and all will be ok.

2006-09-16 09:30:38 · answer #6 · answered by Ellie29uk 3 · 1 1

Here, end your confusion. www.911myths.com Also note that the WTC is light steel and glass, the Empire State building is reinforced concrete. Its was not a B52 those weren't even being built yet. I believe it was a B37 or some sort. Much smaller aircraft than even today's commercial aircraft.

2006-09-16 09:29:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You're absolutely right here. Have no doubt about it, the whole thing was very carefully pre-planned. It's part of an ongoing super conspiracy by the ruling elite Illuminati to start world war 3, and establish a New World Order fascist police state. More info below.

2006-09-16 09:30:24 · answer #8 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 1 2

The fireproofing was blasted off from the impact which weakened the girters that were holding up each floor, the fire did contribute to it, after a while - the girters just gave way, and each floor collapsed - one after another. It did look like a controlled explosion, but it was actually natural.

2006-09-16 09:25:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anton Mathew 5 · 2 1

Al Bundy is right do some serious research. And I,ve seen some your Q&A,s before and a deep thinker like yourself might hurt something trying to figure the answer to a question this serious.

2006-09-16 09:40:00 · answer #10 · answered by Iknowthisone 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers