Dirty trick?
2006-09-16 01:42:54 · 13 answers · asked by Big Jim 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If you watch the video loose change, at least know that they lied in it, almost everywhere. then watch the video "screw loose change"
http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11timeline60pg
http://www.911myths.com/index.html
2006-09-16 01:45:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There isn't a clear indication as to whether this story is true or not, but I have some issues with it.
First: the account is unsourced. Who is this partner? We don't know. It's a report of what the freelance writer Alexandra Richard says she's been told by this unnamed person. Is her account accurate? Is the unnamed persons account accurate? There's no way to tell.
Second: it was unconfirmed. One or two other newspapers ran it, but they just reproduced what Le Figaro had already said. There was no independent confirmation, at least initially. And actually, an online translation uses the headline "CIA Agent Allegedly Met bin Ladin" ( http://www.tenc.net/misc/lefigaro.htm ), which if true sounds a little different.
Author Richard Labeviere later wrote a book, where he said "a Gulf prince who presented himself as an adviser to the Emir of Bahrain" confirmed the meeting, which had been arranged by Prince Turki al-Faisal of Saudi Arabia. This was the plan.
2006-09-16 09:40:52 · answer #2 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden was an ally against the USSR occupation of Afghanistan. In the 1990's the CIA was watching him because he had become an enemy of the US.
Layers of conspiracy are not needed to explain Bin Laden's attacks on the US, or the US involvement in Iraq.
2006-09-16 08:55:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is indicative of the fact that Bin Laden had no involvement in 9/11. He denied involvement immediately after the event.
The name Al Qaeda was created by the CIA.
Further research leads one to the conclusion that it was an inside job.
2006-09-16 09:29:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fishy fishy fishy.
Something is upand the media is too chicken to investigate and find out the truth. Probably Osama still is a CIA asset, useful to them in order to scare Americans into giving up all their freedoms to the powers that be.
2006-09-16 08:49:53 · answer #5 · answered by stj 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think any one would be niave to believe everything the Government tells them. a persons belief is their own, but ask yourself this. . . .
How many personal liberties have you lost in order for the Government to "protect" you from the terrorists?
2006-09-16 08:54:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i also suggest you watch loose change , that movie is very funny and entertaining , don't miss the part where the cell phone calls were fake , that was a good one
2006-09-16 08:47:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Watch the video "loose change"
2006-09-16 08:44:32 · answer #8 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
its no suprize we always back those tyoes, Noriega from example, hell we even helped Fidel, maybe if America stayed out of others business and took care of our own people , we'd be better off
2006-09-16 08:55:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They are too close to too many.
2006-09-16 08:53:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋