2006-09-16 01:14:28 · 5 answers · asked by angleprincessgirl 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cell Phones & Plans
I've had both and I found Verizon to be much better in service and coverage.
Maybe it's because of where I live but with sprint I would always drop calls, lose signal, and have problems receiving messages. When I'd call and complain - their answer was ALWAYS -(I swear they read it off a 5x7 index card hanging on their cubical wall) - "Your contract does not guarantee your service."
I've had Verizon for about 5 months now, and I can honestly say that I can not remember the last time I had a problem with the service at all. If I did have a dropped call it was probably because of the person on the other line, not my phone.
BTW - when Wilma hit last year and we were without power or phones for 2 weeks - my husbands sprint and my t-mobile did not start working again for about 1 week. His best friend's Verizon phone had service throughout. We were able to call family with his phone.
2006-09-16 01:28:08 · answer #1 · answered by crisagi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would go with Verizon for the service I like nokia but I think verizon has alot of LG's and samsung's
2006-09-16 01:40:59 · answer #2 · answered by blaze67247 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i personally like motorolas. i have had several different versions, and they last a long time and have a good set up as far as the menu goes.
2006-09-16 01:22:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the samsung a900
2006-09-16 01:22:47 · answer #4 · answered by Bzin* Lateralus* 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
VERIZON
2006-09-16 01:23:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋