English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Personally I think he is leading us all into another World War. He has stepped on so many countries toes, Made most of all other countries hate us. He has broken the law, passed laws that gave himself absolute power AND CONGRESS ALLOWED THIS! The last leader to give himself absolute power was Adolf Hitler. He has ignored the Geneva Convention, still trying to drill oil in Natl. Parks, appointed personal friends into his cabinet even though most of them has no political exp. i am tired of his sh it, and so is everyone I speak with. I would like to know how many people feel the same way, I don't speak with. Serious Inquiriesonly please. Those that are familiar with my q and a know that I am an *sshole and will personally send emails to anyone that says I DON"T berating you for your idiocy. Thanx people, lets see where this goes. 1 more thing, he is an idiot, and I can screw things up as well as he has.

2006-09-16 00:23:33 · 13 answers · asked by bobby h 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

And Scott K. What kind of "good" president cares more about what is going on in Iraq and totally sh it on his own people? He blatently shat on New Orleans his own people, by not going over peoples heads to intervene when OUR OWN country needed help. What kind of leader is he? If you don't have oil contracts he can profit off he couldn't care less. And the meaning of democracy is the peoples choice. He is not supposed to be a dictator but a servant of his OWN country. Thats what we pay him for. Idiot.

2006-09-16 10:34:56 · update #1

13 answers

That would just leave us with Dr. Evil and, since he runs the country already, it would be a complete waste of time and effort.

Anyway, if not mini-me Bush or Cheney ... who.

Bush's presidency has been a total disaster and none of the current crop of politicians has the skills to handle it.

Face it, the most admired American in the world, and America's best politician, is Bill Clinton. A Powell - Clinton administration could maybe squeeze an ounce of good out of this crap.




Hey lilblondi(bimbo)bear’s –

Fourth graders are great, but there is a reason they cannot vote. Moreover, if you really loved America you would not vote, either.

The first step to a recovery is recognizing that you have an intelligence problem – you don’t have any intelligence, and that’s the problem.

Only weeks after Clinton took office in 1993 (following 12 straight years of Republican presidents), terrorist scum tried to bring down the towers.

What did Clinton do?

- within a month, four people were arrested,
- they went on trial that September,
- the trial lasted 6 months, and
- they were all convicted

Are you aware that Clinton stopped eight 9/11-size attacks, despite a Republican Congress that tried to stop his every move?

Are you aware that the very first thing that Clinton did, as he was leaving the White House and Bush was moving in, was to tell Bush that the single greatest threat to the safety of the American people was Osama Bin-Laden. He had his staff stress to Bush’s staff that this was the most important thing Bush needed to know now that he was President.

Are you aware that on August 6, 2001, Bush received a PDBM (President's Daily Briefing Memo) warning that:

- OBL was planning an attack inside the United States, and
- that he might use airplanes, and
- that the targets would be politically important (DC) and major metropolitan centers (NYC)?


Are you aware that Bush, Rice, and the rest of the Bush administration ignored the memo?

Are you aware that the Bush administration abandoned the Israeli – Palestinian issue?

Are you aware that Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade Iraq which, according to your own Republican Congress’s report on pre-war intelligence:

- there were NO terrorists in Iraq before Bush invaded
- there was no connection between Iraq and OBL, AQ, or any terrorist organization
- Hussein did not provide training camps to terrorists
- Hussein hated AQ before we did
- Hussein did not hide al-Zargawi - he tried to have him arrested

Are you aware that the Taliban are stronger in Afghanistan now than they were before Bush invaded?

That opium production is Afghanistan is at record levels and the money from it fills terrorist’s pockets.

Are you aware that Bush is losing in Iraq?

Are you aware that Bush is losing the war on terror?

Are you aware that Bush has destroyed America’s dignity, honor, and reputation?

Of course you are aware of all this because, after all, you are no 4th-grader, right?

You know these things and yet you support Bush, because like all right-wing scum you are an idiot and, worse, a traitor to the United States who supports the spilling of American blood on the altar of Osama Bin-Laden.

Will your lust for American blood be satisfied when Republicans have killed more Americans than OBL and AQ?

The First Amendment does not say that stupid white-trash Christian scum get to make the rules and run the country.

2006-09-16 00:48:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I am not familiar with US constitutional law, but I think the grounds for impeachment must be more specific than 'asshole' or "idiot" although in my opinion he overqualifies in both.

Basically he is voted dictator for a term of 4 years, this is called democracy, and anything other than democracy is evil, because democracy is good, except in palestine where democracy voted in the terrorists that are anti-USA.

It is a good thing he is fighting the war on 'terror' in Iraq, because imagine what would be happening over there now if he didn't take control from that evil dictator Saddam Hussein. It would be chaos!

Overall I think the world is a safer place now.

2006-09-16 00:28:39 · answer #2 · answered by angle_of_deat_69 5 · 2 1

Unfortunately being a jerk doesn't qualify for impeachment. However, lying to Americans does. The reason he gave for going to war with Iraq was for finding weapons of mass destruction, which he never did find. Then it changed to finding Saddam. Then it changed to spreading democracy. Now it's to fight terrorism. Clinton faced impeachment lying about a woman, but didn't kill thousands of US troops doing it. Clinton apologized to Americans. Bush never will. He thinks he's right, while the rest of Americans are wrong.

2006-09-16 00:54:39 · answer #3 · answered by jatz46 3 · 1 1

If you want our country to go down in flames by American-hating extremists, if you care nothing about the ones we lost to terrorism, if you crave another attack due to a liberal pussy in office too afraid to step on some toes to protect our country instead of a president willing to fight for our freedoms, then you would want Bush impeached. Also I find it sad you're only willing to complain and ***** about how much you hate the president to others that feel like you, and don't have the credentials or the balls to debate someone that opposes your view. You should talk to the nearest 4th grader on how to improve your writing and spelling skills as well. I owe you thanks for making me laugh today.

2006-09-16 00:49:37 · answer #4 · answered by lilblondiebear 2 · 0 1

I would like to see him impeached,but being realistic it will never
happen. We can however exercise our voting rights and make sure we vote in a president with more intelligence,compassion
and who hasn't a father who wanted to take out a Mideastern
leader.

2006-09-16 00:46:55 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 1 1

Yes, let's all hear from the Bush-Haters and the American-Haters.
This is your chance to verbally support the terrorists and al Qaeda; and show your hatred for our president.

2006-09-16 00:38:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I'm not going to argue with you because your right Bush is a moron and if there was any justice in the world at the very least he should be impeached.

2006-09-16 00:27:49 · answer #7 · answered by t-bomb 2 · 2 2

I personally like President Bush, and I think he is doing a very good job under the circumstances.

2006-09-16 00:26:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

your a moron.....exceptfor the geneva convention remark i agree with that.We should of exacuted all the taliban on the spot instead of jailing them.As instructed in the geneva conv. for fighters not in uniform are considered spies and subject to immediate exacution :)

2006-09-16 00:36:31 · answer #9 · answered by scott k 2 · 3 1

let the idiot republicans deal with him...they put him into office and they are paying for it by losing controll of the senate and congress...i knew he should have never been put into office...he's trying to finish what his daddy and reagan couldn't finish...they are all idiots but nobody impeached them

2006-09-16 00:36:16 · answer #10 · answered by edandsarahmae02 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers