2006-09-15 23:26:36 · 24 answers · asked by . 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
ironic huh
2006-09-15 23:30:17 · answer #1 · answered by lost one 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First of all, why does your question even set up the two for comparison? It's like you're using "Hitler", who was a real historical person, someone responsible for frankly unimaginable atrocities, as a vague label for any leader you dislike. All that question does is say, "I think Bush sucks."
Why not ask a real question, like "Why did the democratic elections, which are supposed to show the will of the American people, end up with a leader that (according to polls) displeases nearly EVERYONE?" You could get some interesting ideas going there, instead of just getting a bunch of people arguing, "Bush is awesome!"/"Goddamn Republican!"
2006-09-16 06:45:14 · answer #2 · answered by Tanuki Girl 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The main difference is that Sep 11th changed the entire Bush goverment. Before that event his rattings were low, after his goverment has an justification to go to war, and be more expansive.
Without Sep11 the bush Admin, would just be poorly run, but because of sep11 the anger of the world is on the u.s
2006-09-16 08:46:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Hilter wasn't supported by big business and oil companies of course. Hilter thought he was doing the right thing ...and for a long time his plans were supported by a lot of people. Bush wants to convince us that he is acting in our best interests and hopes we won't notice when he f**ks over the world ...and Bush was only elected because the whole thing was set up ...it was so convenient that they lost all the African American votes. Oops!
2006-09-16 06:37:54 · answer #4 · answered by Katie 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
night and day....bush has not exterminated an entire race because of what race they are- that is what hitler did..... Bush has not done that. we are not at war because we want to exterminate an entire race- let me repeat that, we are not at war because we want to exterminate an entire race. everyone can disagree about President Bush all they want- but no one has the right to say he is like Hitler. It is offensive.
by the way do you have nothing better to do with your time? suggestion- try reading some history books and getting your facts straight.
2006-09-16 07:29:42 · answer #5 · answered by April H 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Uh, Bush is a great president! Last time I checked, Bush wasn't sending people he didn't like to a concentration camp to come out half dead...
2006-09-16 08:44:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hitler wasn't a "psychopath," he did what he thought was right. Bush, on the other hand, is just a moron.
2006-09-16 06:35:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Cos Hitler was Greman & Bush is American.
2006-09-16 06:37:09 · answer #8 · answered by macman 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because Bush is only an ********, not a psychopath?
Way I figure, those who strive for power should be the last people we give it to.
2006-09-16 06:34:13 · answer #9 · answered by Simon D 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because life is nothing but a game of contradictions.
2006-09-16 07:36:17 · answer #10 · answered by atulsonak001 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you insane? Go back and read some history. Bush is a " kitty cat" compared to Hitler.
2006-09-16 06:34:26 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋