If there is a possibility, please, just leave an example.
2006-09-15 19:28:42 · 9 answers · asked by Anyaina 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
A war, no. A revolution on the other hand is possible. Take a look at what Gandhi did with his method of passive resistance, India is a democracy because of his bloodless campaign. They were freed from British rule,without weapons or violence. He paved the way for Martin Luther King and Cesar Chavez , both practiced civil disobedience.
2006-09-15 19:54:33 · answer #1 · answered by pinacoladasundae 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is possible to win a war with out weapons
2006-09-16 02:40:27 · answer #2 · answered by elisha i 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO and a BIG NO...........No matter what kind of war it is that you're in to or that your planning to wage,weaponry and ammunition of all sorts are needed and must haves.Even a battle with your very self you must be equip with the necessary values and inclinations in order to make the necessary decisions.or even a battle with conscience still you need weapons especially that of moral uprightness and clear rational thinking.
2006-09-16 02:37:22 · answer #3 · answered by xyle 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the other side only understands the language of weapons.
2006-09-16 09:44:55 · answer #4 · answered by atulsonak001 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If any mother has succeeded in teaching her child/children how to get along without fighting, than the answer is yes.
War is (to me) a large version of children fighting over their toys: "It's mine..., I saw it first...", etc.
2006-09-16 02:46:00 · answer #5 · answered by JubJub 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
2006-09-16 02:30:55 · answer #6 · answered by sshazzam 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes ofcourse. dependesn on what ue waepon it.
2006-09-16 02:49:28 · answer #7 · answered by mightymouse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so.
2006-09-16 02:31:07 · answer #8 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope dope
2006-09-16 02:31:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋