English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

28 answers

Good question...
Just anti american self-serving traitors I guess..

2006-09-15 18:21:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 7

They're not. The law is the law and not even Bush is not above the law.

If you were plucked off the street, put into a secret prison where even your family did not know where you were, would that be okay? And let's just say, you were tortured & demeaned on top of it, and then when you asked for a lawyer or legal counsil they denied you that too. Would that be okay?

It is not a matter of liberals being worried about the terrorists rights. It is international law, specifically the Geneva Convention, that states POW's will not be tortured or demeaned to obtain information. Bush has set up secret prisons so that he can hide his intent to torture POW's. It was quite by accident that this was leaked to the citizens through media sources.

All Americans should care about how other countries view us. The world is watching us. 70% of other countries have voiced their disgust of Bush's policies. As an American citizen (and no, not a Liberal), I care that we are no longer viewed as a super power by other countries, don't you?

2006-09-15 18:42:09 · answer #2 · answered by Nancy L 4 · 1 1

This is hard, because I don't know what I am; if I'm talking to a full-blown conservative, I probably would be a liberal; and if I'm talking to a full-blown liberal, I'd probably find that I'm more of a conservative.

I really think the naiive liberals you refer to, have have a box of rocks for brains! and they have never had terrorists threatening them personally, or those they love, in any way! They are just plain IGNORANT...and naiive.

That area is very backward and our troops have been first-hand witnesses of it & until those militants become higher educated and more world-ly...they will think with their 'sword'...and think everything is solved with barbarianism (terrorism). The liberals you're talking about are going around with blinders on, and won't see the truth until they are in front of the killers themselves---and then it'll be too late for them.

2006-09-15 18:38:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

They have a one track mind. The only thought they have is to hate Bush. Bush won't even be running for President again. They are self serving and self serving people only care about self. They aren't worried about you and me or anyone else. They think they can save the world by making a deal with the terrorists. Don't they realize how long the terrorists have been at work. They had their chance when Clinton was in office. At that time they did nothing.

2006-09-15 19:09:13 · answer #4 · answered by DeeJay 7 · 3 1

well, i would consider myself somewhat liberal as opposed to what i understand to be the conservative "christo- fascist" types whose material i've read on this and other sites. anyway, i don't believe "liberals" hate the troops. what they hate is that a cabal of psychopaths has conned a substantial number of americans into believing that they (the crooks) really care about america, when in fact all they care about is themselves and their cronies all becoming richer at our expense (google "bush crime family"). also disliked is the fact that the crooks intend to do away with all personal liberties guaranteed by the constitution and create a dictatorial police state so that they can rip the country off more easily. protestors will just disappear or conveniently "commit suicide". ordinary folks don't believe this can or will happen, but that in fact is the plan if you do the research. unquestionably, the "islamists" are psychotic zealots who will have to be taken care of. but, it would be best to have relatively "honest" politicians in charge to do the job, rather than the robber barons in office currently. at another level, the current administration is actually only middle level management, and take their orders from the small group of ultimate psychopaths who "own the planet". their agenda is not only to become richer and more "powerful", but to subjugate the planet's population as completely as possible through any and all means, none of which will be humane or pleasant. do some research and stop being in denial.

2006-09-15 18:45:13 · answer #5 · answered by drakke1 6 · 1 2

this is the saddest bunch of answers I think I have ever seen to any question... nothing but baseless insults so far... do you guys even have reasons for what you believe?

but I will basically defer to Colin Powell to answer your question... I guess he's a crazy liberal too?

"Powell said Bush’s plan to redefine the Geneva Conventions would cause the world “to doubt the moral basis” of the fight against terror and “put our own troops at risk.”

in other words, if you don't value anyones troops, no one will ever value American troops at all... take Jill Carrol for example, if these measures pass, anyone like her won't have a head, thanks to this measure... instead of now being alive...

but I guess Powell doesn't know what he's talking about and all those guys that have never been in the army know what they are talking about... yeah, I'm sure that's it...

so my question is... why do conservatives push this policy that will clearly put our troops into more harm? why do you hate the troops so much that you want them to be treated even worse?

2006-09-15 18:33:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Whats terrorism?
If someone comes into your land, your country, bombs you, kills your wife, mother and kids, and you are fighting them, according to Bush and Blair They are terrorists.

Using lies, deciet, and treachery, going against international will, alleging that some country has WMDs you attack a soveriegn country, kill thousands, Miam millions, destroy thier social fabric, loot thier wealth, bring the nations economy to shatters, and you are doing the world some good.

to do that they have to use thier armies, they have to lie to thier soldiers to justfy the wars, and you call the opressed terrorists,?

The real threat is from democrats, actually the ones who gave birth to what YOU CALL TERRORISM. and terrorists. They had no reason to goto war in Iraq, and they did, causing murder and mayhem, making barbarians of thier very own diciplined army. being short sighted, adopting policies against the muslims and generally insulting and abusing them just trying to appease Israel,

Using every possible pretex to start wars, so they can sell more ammunition. employ cheap scare tactics at home to keep thier electorate feeling insecure from a persumed threat, and continue with uncalled for, futile wars that have actually nothing to do with the Americans. or thier national interest,

And the one threat to thier unchecked actions is from the Liberals , and to counter that they label them Dumb, and mad and unpatriotic and what not,

That I suppose is your democratic way, Don't respect others opinions, just call them idiots, or mentally ill, and continue with what u think is right. after all its only the Democrats who own the country, who can define whats true patriotism,

One other thing, The Gontanamo Bay prison, Wow, what human rights records have been set, America the super power, America the invincible LOL, Torture the POWs, No laws for them, no courts, Mock international conventions, and Abu Grhraib Prison,? LOL , Hail Amercia, Gods own people, Sadists, Sadomachoists, Sexual perverts,

do some thinking man before you digest everything told to you.

Welcome to the new world order.

2006-09-15 18:42:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

It is a confluence of several sick ideologies:
- peacelover radicals;
- the anti-war movement of the 60's & 70's garnering power for the Democrats;
- the ACLU wanting to do what ever they can legally to bring down the USA in legal terms;
- liberals and socialist in general;
- left overs of the Clinton Administrations decimation of both the CIA and military units, and the negative stigma he caused,
- Special interests groups in the country doing all they can to take down President Bush;
- an anti-military mind set in the major network media of the country;
- and, a lack of understanding about what the military's role is in our country and what they do for us all, 'ignorance'.

2006-09-15 19:42:13 · answer #8 · answered by scubadiver50704 4 · 4 2

Your question is a clear indication that you dont understand the issue! Whatever severe standard we apply to the enemy can also be inflicted upon our soldiers if they are captured without punishment after the war. doesnt have a damn thing to do with "Liberal" more with reality. Thats why his Republicans are also fighting against Bush on this issue. People with military experience like John McCain who WAS a prisoner of war.

2006-09-15 21:45:39 · answer #9 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 1 3

Did you listen carefully to the news? It's Republicans AND Democrats that are opposing the President on this one. Three Republican ex-military men are against it. One is McCain, who was a prisoner of war. If Bush gets this bill passed, it could be very bad for our servicemen if they were ever captured. Bush wants to change national laws when it comes to prisoners of war. I suggest you do a little more research on this..

2006-09-15 18:34:58 · answer #10 · answered by FL Girl 6 · 4 2

Ok I'm a liberal....well democrat which is so different...i don't care what the general population of republicans say (like my father). And first...I support the troops 100% and understand why we haven't left Iraq.

Here is my answer....Because this is america and as americans we have the right to be stupid and say things to stir up controversy.

I don't think it's that they are more concerned about the rights of terrorist..liberals just like hear themselves talk.

2006-09-15 18:29:24 · answer #11 · answered by I_love_chase's_tie 2 · 3 5

fedest.com, questions and answers