the us goverment knocked down the twin towers.the reason was to invade iraq.osama bin ladin is from afghanistan.how could the us mistake iraq with afganistan. It was for the oil.The us was going to blame fidel castro for the terrorist attack to invade cuba.the us goverment had it planned out osama bin ladin worked with the us goverment.
2006-09-15 18:03:56 · 15 answers · asked by 8ball 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
what do you think?
2006-09-15 18:15:37 · update #1
The government supported terrorism...yes the CIA trained Osama Bin Laden a long time ago in efforts to gain an allie in Afghanistan...we did not knock down the towers, as for the Pentagon that is still to be determined...Iraq was because Bush wanted to follow in Daddy's footsteps and Hussein put a hit on his father (that was his agenda from the door) Now the cigarette taxes put in effect in NY and NJ that makes cigs 6-9 dollars a pack supported terrorism as the terrorists would just go to VA get cartons for $15 and sell packs for $5 on the streets making huge profits...and by the way we did invade Afghanistan before Iraq so they weren't mixed up, he just changed his priorities.
2006-09-15 18:17:12 · answer #1 · answered by Skinny 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If this was for oil, why in the hell am I paying $3.00/gallon. How did Castro get involved in this?! When one makes absolute claims, one should state their sources. You fail to do so..... So it seems that you are simply making ad homonym attacks against the Republican Administration.
So point by point....
There is no mistake regarding his nationality....bin Laden is NOT Afghani, (I believe) that he has a Syrian father and a Yemeni mother and he lived in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Jordan and several other countries. He moved to Afghanistan to join the mujahadeen in its fight with the former USSR. Asa member of the mujahadeen, the US did likely fund some of his training and equipment. That does not mean that he was 'in league' with any US officials to coordinate the bombing.
The Republican Argument was that the Iraqi leadership (remember Saddam Hussein?) had weapons of mass destruction (short and long range missiles capable of carrying chemical, biological, and nuclear payloads that could be targeted against the US and its allies. Then the Republican Administrations said that Hussein funded, supported, harbored, and trained Al Qaeda fighters. This argument was proposed immediately after the Republicans learned what most of the rest of the world already knew: Iraq had no WMD and no ability to make such devices.
Were there people who had info that could have been used to prevent this? likely. You should chalk it up to incompetence of the most disgusting type.
Rather than making accusations that are laughable, provide sources, show references to evidence that can start the ball rolling. Blind, rabid, unsupported 'fingerpointing is of no value. Was there an agend? damn skippy. Did they need the WTC, Washington, Pensylvania attacks, not one bit.
BTW: What the heck is with you bringing Cuba into this?! If you think they would be a willing participant to either side on this your must either be nuts or have some great evidence that you aren't sharing.
2006-09-16 01:30:41 · answer #2 · answered by hhabilis 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought we took after bin laden in Afghanistant and took down the Taliban, with osama high tailing it to Pakistan. I must've been reading the wrong history. The terrorist harbinger and possible WMDer was Iraq, we finished the job started by Bush I. Yes it's all for the oil, i hate to see the world 50 years from now when fossils fuel is even more scarce.
2006-09-16 01:34:04 · answer #3 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are about right.
Most terrorism, not just 9/11, but also 7/7, Bali, Madrid etc, is created by the secret service departments of CIA/MI6/Mosad/ISI.
Al Qaeda didn't even exist on 9/11
2006-09-16 04:42:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The more advanced countries just invent their own terror and then identify it where they want it to be, so they can then attack to achieve their agendas.
You cant fight terror it is an idea "the war on terror" is just buzz words to keep the sheeples happy at home and not thinking too much.
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=9381
have a read get informed or just go back to the tv...most do anyway.
2006-09-16 09:40:35 · answer #5 · answered by Bearable 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Makes you wonder---don't it? I figure they haven't found Osama for a reason. Maybe they're afraid of what Osama will tell the American people about their own Govt. We're finding out slowly but surely.
2006-09-16 01:16:27 · answer #6 · answered by Nancy L 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what's in Cuba, cigars and maybe in the future nice summer resort and maybe a new last Vegas. Don't get me wrong Cuba is a very beautiful country.
Iraq if you are digging in your own garden for watter your get oil, so Iraq is the best place for cheap oil , oil is power, power is money, so bush is after money and idiots who die for USA or others causes get there picture on the wall as heroes dies for the cause and bush bank account and his sponsors grows grows from idiots like us.
2006-09-16 01:25:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I just don't agree with your theory,,, Osama is hiding in Pakistan,, on the Afghanistan border,,,, Bush is allowing Osama to set policy for his war in Iraq,,, the "caliphate" the central front of WW111,, Bush's war on terror........ bin Laden is training new Taliban recruits,,,,,,,,,,,
2006-09-16 01:10:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Osama admited that al qeda did it. You are a nut case.
2006-09-16 01:11:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Steadyyyyyyy partner. Your on the plank, no no don't look down!
Just slowly back up until you fall backwards and then go to sleep.
2006-09-16 01:11:41 · answer #10 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋