English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or something in between.

(I shouldn't have to explain any further)

2006-09-15 17:43:02 · 11 answers · asked by busterp 3 in News & Events Current Events

Tough crowd. Fox news must be over.

2006-09-15 18:30:44 · update #1

11 answers

As a non-American, I see the War on Terror being solely American.

War on Terror or Error, I think this is a deception by your president to get the heat off him. He was on vacation before the attack remember? Why did he allow Osama's families safe passage out of the US after twin tower attacks?

Its economics that's simply putting the brakes of the War on Terror. It has to be a global war and not just a US initiative but how many countries and 'moderate' muslims are willing to rid this ideology from our lives?

Its a War on Terror to cover our Errors.

2006-09-15 20:41:37 · answer #1 · answered by SHIH TZU SAYS 6 · 1 0

I happen to agree with Henry Kissenger. He has always maintained,"This will become the war of civilization." And I believe that. This is non negotiable, and going to be more than anything we have ever seen.

2006-09-15 20:39:11 · answer #2 · answered by Desi 7 · 1 0

As a united states Air stress Vietnam Veteran, i'm completely insulted by employing your question. I and my fellow Vietnam Veterans from each and every of the amenities, did not have blunders contained in the way we fought the warfare. We received each and every conflict we participated in. The warfare develop into lost on the negotiation table, by employing Henry Kissinger and Jerry Ford. It develop into helped alongside by employing the shortcoming of funding the congress gave the defense force to wrestle that warfare. If the defense force might want to have fought the Vietnam warfare like it develop into meant to be fought Vietnam might want to be one u . s . a .. this is a democracy whose capital might want to be Saigon. The warfare might want to have ended probable in 1967 or 1968. The warfare on Terror is being received as I style. There are tiny little cells of terrorists left. Al Quida is loosing its domination on the cells. we are gaining the better hand. we've each and every reason to trust we are able to win. about your question. you at the on the spot are not in basic terms insulting, belittling, and in basic terms easy ignorant about the defense force contained in the Vietnam warfare and the defense force contained in the present warfare on Terror, you're also putting those titles on the human beings of u . s . of u . s ..

2016-11-27 01:43:02 · answer #3 · answered by cassone 3 · 0 0

Worst War
We might not win this.
There are people abroad that want your family dead.
There are people at home that don't seem to understand this.

These animals are willing to die for a twisted ideal. Japan used kamikazes. Picture millions of Muslims being kamikazes.

This country better wake up.

2006-09-15 17:49:53 · answer #4 · answered by yoho 2 · 2 3

life or death
both sides believe this
who can negotiate peace

2006-09-15 17:50:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yep.

2006-09-15 18:08:46 · answer #6 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 2 0

Terrorism is an ideology. How do you fight an ideology?

2006-09-15 19:17:28 · answer #7 · answered by Kelli3 1 · 2 1

Words of idiocy. Words of stupidity?

2006-09-15 17:47:06 · answer #8 · answered by composertype 5 · 1 2

War as propaganda?

2006-09-15 18:06:34 · answer #9 · answered by Reba K 6 · 1 0

I dont think they invaded Iraq by mistake...

2006-09-15 18:26:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers