Yeah, utter crap.
2006-09-15 17:02:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
This is the most blatant attempt at forced propaganda I have ever seen. But, they had to come up with something with a lot of people seeing the other videos that showed an entirely different story than the official one. Unfortunately, there will be a lot of believers who will stand by the president and deny anything wrong or any kind of wrongdoing whatsoever. Hell, Mr. Bush is such a good con artist that he'll get you to believe the red, white, and blue are really orange,pink, and purple.........
2006-09-16 00:12:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Conservative? Is that what they call themselves? I prefer to call them exactly what they are, dumb as s republicans. As for path to 9/11 I haven't seen it. Is it worth watching or is it a waste of time. Sorry but you called them conservatives and I had to comment. I think they have the labels on backwards, the republicans should be called liberal because they are so "liberal" about pollution and natural resources and the democrats tend to be "conservative" with things like that!
2006-09-16 00:08:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by madroofer36 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Actually no they cut out a lot of the parts where Bill Clinton had the chance to kill Bin Laden and refused because he was preoccupied with his Monika Lewinsky problem. So no the Cons disavow any connection to it.
2006-09-16 00:03:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
You must be Little Red Riding Hood.
2006-09-16 00:03:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was a docu-drama, get over it. The producer never claimed that all the dialog was accurate. The events themselves however are correct.
I found it to be far more accurate than that worthless piece of crap "Loose Change"
2006-09-16 00:09:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jay S 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
No,I already knew all that stuff, but they had to have some1 put it out there so you liberals would know the real deal!
After all I'm a student of the EIB. We learn it as it happens!
2006-09-16 00:05:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Next will be Condalice...a in Wonderland
2006-09-16 00:08:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Many Americans forgot that many other sets of people were human long ago. They checked their consciences at the door and are building an empire. Join me in letting go of the delusional belief that you can stop them. Resistance if futile. Accept your fate and surrender gracefully, to the glory of Washington!
P.S.
September 11th, 2001 required us to take every emerging threat to our country seriously, and it shattered the illusion that terrorists attack us only after we provoke them. On that day, we were not in Iraq, we were not in Afghanistan, but the terrorists attacked us anyway - and killed nearly 3,000 men, women, and children in our own country. My conviction comes down to this: We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them. And we will defeat the terrorists by capturing and killing them abroad, removing their safe havens, and strengthening new allies like Iraq and Afghanistan in the fight we share.
September 11th, 2001 enabled us to convince you that you live under constant threat of attack and that you need to surrender your civil liberties to Big Brother in exchange for your security. They deceived you into believing that the "Terrorists" attacked us unprovoked, despite the fact that the US government has murdered millions of civilians over the years while calling them "collateral damage". We have also supported genocidal regimes like Israel. On 9/11, we were not in Iraq, we were not in Afghanistan, but the "Terrorists" attacked us anyway, and killed nearly 3,000 men, women and children in our own country. Forget the fact that over 2,600 Americans have been sacrificed on the altar of Mammon. Disregard those "130,000" Iraqis who have died. According to Robert Fisk of the Independent; “The Ministry of Health figures in July 06 alone, was 1,100 Iraqi deaths in Baghdad alone. If you spread that across, Mosul, Kirkuk, maybe Irbil [in the north], all way down to Basra [in the south], through the months, and you must be talking of 3,000 to 4,000 a month. That's 36,000 to 48,000 a year”. This makes the “100,000 figure of [the Lancet study] rightly as being quite conservative”, added Fisk. The figure provided by Fisk has been recently substantiated by credible sources. The most conservative estimate of Iraqi deaths was reported in October 2004 by a group of medical scientists from Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Columbia University and Al-Mustansiriyah School of Medicine in Baghdad. The conservatives estimate of more than 180,000 Iraqi deaths was published in the reputed and peer-reviewed British medical journal the Lancet. If one includes the atrocities in Fallujah, Ramadi, al-Qaim, Tel Afar, Hillah, Baghdad and the daily mayhem instigated by U.S. forces and their collaborators, the number of Iraqis killed since March 2006 would be in the 250,000 mark or even more. It also estimated that 85 per cent of all violent deaths are by “coalition forces” and that many of these are due to U.S. aerial bombardments. The majority of the victims were innocent women and children.
Never mind the $428 billion my regime has wasted on this debacle we started based on lies. We are winning the war because America has made another imperial conquest of a nation rich in a vital resource upon which our corporate cronies can capitalize, and has secured a foothold from which it can dominate the rest of the Middle East.
While that is a tragedy, it pales in comparison to the 3-5 million civilians we killed in Vietnam. Furthermore, most of those alleged to have perpetrated the 9/11 attack were from Saudi Arabia, where America strongly supports the ruthlessly oppressive House of Saud while giving lip service to spreading "freedom and liberty" in the Middle East. Yet we attacked Afghanistan and Iraq because we needed what we thought would be relatively easy targets to launch our own perpetual war. Now that we have invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, we have new allies in our "War on Terror", which could also be characterized as the "War on those Who Oppose US Global Domination". We will defeat the "Terrorists" by engaging in torture, rendition, imprisonment with no charges or trial, and creating puppet allies like Iraq and Afghanistan.
We want to crush opposition to US imperialism and create an Iraq that will serve as a model as to how the US will conquer the rest of the Middle East.
My most solemn responsibility is to protect our Nation, and at that I have failed. 9/11 occurred on my watch and over 10,000 people died in the aftermath of Katrina as a result of my regime's obscene devotion of resources to the war, and its inept and anemic response to the disaster.
It follows, that there is overwhelming prima fascia evidence to indict George W. Bush and his accomplices with war crimes and crime against humanity. http://www.atlantaprogressivenews.com/news/0088.html
If the American people justify the death penalty for Americans who committed murderous crimes in America, they should not ignore those who committed mass murder in Iraq.
2006-09-16 00:38:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It happened. Get over it.
2006-09-16 00:02:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
yes indeed,the repigs will use it in there election ads !!
2006-09-16 00:06:49
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
2⤋