English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Lets not forget what he did when he was suppose to go to Nam. he chickened out like a lil u know i won't say lol. Far as I'm concerned both Bush & Clinton are cowards. Both ran away from duty in the military.

2006-09-15 15:58:26 · 5 answers · asked by i_got_sars 1 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

Because, as we see on here and in the media all the time, people are lemmings that believe anything their chosen political party tells them. "Republican, BAD.....Democrat, GOOD" (say in caveman voice....) Or vice versa.

Very few people have consistency of thought.

2006-09-15 16:06:14 · answer #1 · answered by Schleppy 5 · 3 0

A) Clinton was way more entertaining.
B) Our economy was much better during his reign.
C) No one cares that Bush OR Clinton ran away.

Such old news...however, I would love to have another Clinton, with or without Monica!

2006-09-15 23:07:22 · answer #2 · answered by BellyRubz 3 · 0 2

Thank god Clinton did then because we had a booming economy for 8 years with interest rates and gas at it's lowest in years!

2006-09-15 23:02:01 · answer #3 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 0 2

I remember when McDonald's was hiring $9 hour in the Clinton years.

2006-09-15 23:05:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

And I agree, but Clinton was cautious in how he went to war.

2006-09-15 23:04:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers