I think that the terrorists should be tortured both as punishment and as a way to force them to give up information.
But scumbag liberals in this country who want to help the terrorists by banning torture are themselves terrorists- Shouldn't Bush have them tortured too as a way to prove his point?
2006-09-15 15:17:58 · 14 answers · asked by OctopusGuy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I don't think you can change a true, dyed in the wool liberal. It is a mental disorder.
2006-09-15 15:20:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Marching proudly into fascism.
2.. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights – Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to ‘look the other way’ of even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
3.. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause – The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe; racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists; terrorists, etc.
7.. Obsession with National Security – Fear is used as a motivation tool by the government over the masses.
http://www.chetzar.com/fascism.html
2006-09-15 22:25:33 · answer #2 · answered by shortchanged 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If Bush was to torture terrorists, that would be great.
He's the biggest terrorist, and a few months in Guantamo would do him good, as well as making the world a safer place.
2006-09-18 11:00:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure- as a beacon of freedom in the world, we should set the standard for how we treat people. Our god-fearing, wonderfully religious president is in support of torture? Amazing how foolish this man is.
None of this makes any sense.
2006-09-15 22:22:44 · answer #4 · answered by Morey000 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Have you ever read the Geneva convention notes? Perhaps the terrorists should torture you for imformation. Hmmm?
2006-09-15 22:20:49 · answer #5 · answered by Sean P 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Bush shouldn't be able to torture anyone.However the military personnel,on the front lines should be allowed to do so.
2006-09-15 22:27:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
"scumbag liberals". Not a lot of room for maneuvering with that broad of a generalization. Some poeple....
2006-09-15 22:31:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amazing logic! And it's amazing that a president who claims to be a Christian is asking for more power to torture people.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
For those interested in 9/11, the Iraq war, etc. check out this website: http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11timeline60pg
It's a time line of events surrounding 9/11 from the 70's to the present. Each entry is referenced with articles in the main stream media. No theories, just facts.
2006-09-15 22:25:58 · answer #8 · answered by Jagatkarta 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Does that mean you think it is OK for others to torture US soldiers as punishment and to give up information?
2006-09-15 22:21:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I would go for that..,set them all in a room with Hillary screaching..,oh man..,thats worse than fingernails down the chalk board.lol
2006-09-15 22:28:14 · answer #10 · answered by halfbright 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
o n then burn the constitution n kill everyone who's not a neocon like u. WOW thats America! land of the free, the land of the braves!
2006-09-15 22:21:18 · answer #11 · answered by saba 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋